gretel-synthetics VS AI-basketball-analysis

Hey there! Co-founder of Gretel.ai here, and I think I can provide some insights on this topic.

Firstly, the concept you're hinting at is not purely traditional ML. In traditional machine learning, we often prioritize feature extraction and engineering specific to a given problem space before training.

What you're describing and what we've been working on at Gretel.ai, is leveraging the power of models like Large Language Models (LLMs) to understand and extrapolate from vast amounts of diverse data without the need for time-consuming feature engineering. Here's a link to our open-source library https://github.com/gretelai/gretel-synthetics for synthetic data generation (currently supporting GAN and RNN-based language models), and also our recent announcement around a Tabular LLM we're training to help people build with data https://gretel.ai/tabular-llm

A few areas where we've found tabular or Large Data Models to be really useful are:

you can try QuantGAN: https://github.com/PakAndrey/QuantGANforRisk also try DoppelGANger https://github.com/gretelai/gretel-synthetics/tree/master/src/gretel_synthetics/timeseries_dgan

Source code: https://github.com/chonyy/AI-basketball-analysis

I built an app to visualize and analyze basketball shots and shooting pose with machine learning.

https://github.com/chonyy/AI-basketball-analysis

The result is pretty nice. However, the only problem is the slow inference speed. I'm now refactoring the project structure and changing the model to a much faster YOLO model.

Thanks for asking! This is not a noob question.

I would say that the similar workflow could be applied to any ball-related sports. The object detection and the tracking algorithm is basically the same. Then, you could add any sport-specific feature!

For example, I have used a similar method to build AI Basketball Analysis.

https://github.com/chonyy/AI-basketball-analysis