gradio VS one-click-installers

gradio is a package developed to ease the development of app interfaces in python and other languages (GitHub)

There's also that library all the AI models started using that gives you a public URL to share. After researching it: https://www.gradio.app/ is the link.

It's used specifically for making simple UIs for machine learning apps. But I guess technically you could use it for anything.

What is the business model for https://www.taipy.io/, https://streamlit.io/, or https://www.gradio.app/? These are nice tools - but how will the sponsoring businesses support themselves? I didn't see any mention of enterprise plans, etc. Is the answer simply that "we've not announced our revenue model yet"? What should one expect?

Repo : https://github.com/gradio-app/gradio

There's TensorFlow.js for running machine learning on JavaScript, but personally, I'd prefer using the Python Gradio package, which is designed for creating UIs for machine learning inference demos.

I found an issue on gradio github but looks like it's closed so I am not sure if it's still a common issue or only I am facing it due to certain settings/absence of a fix. ( https://github.com/gradio-app/gradio/issues/3060 )

I disagree hard with this – for instance I've recently needed to dig into the code for the Gradio library, and when PRs are like https://github.com/gradio-app/gradio/pull/3300 (and the merge commit's message is what it is) it's hard to understand why some decisions have been made when doing `git annotate` later on.

Gradio for a ui that your commanderGPT can visit and use

gradio is documented, it doesn't seem very complex, it would be something like moving this block under the other one. i think it's ui_extra_networks.py, the file you are looking to edit. (if you do it make a copy to restore when you go to update)

Gradio did have an issue for a while where your URL was guessable, so unless you had a password it was pretty easy to find, but as far as I know they've increased the complexity so much that it's no longer an issue.

AMD does not offer installation options for ROCm on Windows. I'm not familiar with the workarounds to make it work; if you find a solution, you can contribute it to https://github.com/oobabooga/one-click-installers/

Running start_windows.bat should take care of everything.

Had the same issue, turns out I was using an old 1 click installer / updater, you need to use https://github.com/oobabooga/one-click-installers and reinstall everything from scratch

Are you sure you're looking at the right folder? start_windows.bat is there. It's listed in the source code: https://github.com/oobabooga/one-click-installers

one-click-installers/INSTRUCTIONS.TXT

https://github.com/oobabooga/one-click-installers/issues/56 they explain it over here.

I solved this by adding the Individual components 2019 Windows 10 SDK, C++ CMake tools for Windows, and MSVC v142 - VS 2019 C++ build tools. See https://github.com/oobabooga/one-click-installers/issues/56

It appears one of the extensions isn't pre-compiled on install. I believe you have the same problem as listed here. https://github.com/oobabooga/one-click-installers/issues/56