grab-site VS wget-lua

Compare grab-site vs wget-lua and see what are their differences.

grab-site

The archivist's web crawler: WARC output, dashboard for all crawls, dynamic ignore patterns (by ArchiveTeam)

wget-lua

Wget-AT is a modern Wget with Lua hooks, Zstandard (+dictionary) WARC compression and URL-agnostic deduplication. (by ArchiveTeam)
Our great sponsors
  • InfluxDB - Power Real-Time Data Analytics at Scale
  • WorkOS - The modern identity platform for B2B SaaS
  • SaaSHub - Software Alternatives and Reviews
grab-site wget-lua
30 2
1,260 81
3.5% -
3.8 6.1
about 1 month ago 3 months ago
Python C
GNU General Public License v3.0 or later GNU General Public License v3.0 only
The number of mentions indicates the total number of mentions that we've tracked plus the number of user suggested alternatives.
Stars - the number of stars that a project has on GitHub. Growth - month over month growth in stars.
Activity is a relative number indicating how actively a project is being developed. Recent commits have higher weight than older ones.
For example, an activity of 9.0 indicates that a project is amongst the top 10% of the most actively developed projects that we are tracking.

grab-site

Posts with mentions or reviews of grab-site. We have used some of these posts to build our list of alternatives and similar projects. The last one was on 2024-01-29.

wget-lua

Posts with mentions or reviews of wget-lua. We have used some of these posts to build our list of alternatives and similar projects. The last one was on 2023-02-10.
  • Alternative to HTTrack (website copier) as of 2023?
    4 projects | /r/DataHoarder | 10 Feb 2023
    You're using it wrong, rtfm, wget is still the standard. It's also extensible beyond the base feature set, take for example wget-lua ArchiveTeams well maintained go to for near all scraping projects by the group.
  • Kiwix - Access Wikipedia (And More) With no Internet
    1 project | /r/selfhosted | 4 Dec 2021
    There are updates changed names but still use more frequent updates than the dumps to get started. I know there is kiwix and xowa. Could probably build it up to current and use wget-at to scrap wikipedia solo. If you want it in html it'll proboy only be a hundred 100TB give or take. I'm wondering if any of the groups are still active on IRC. Saw mentions of a few but I lost my place in all the mobile chrome tabs.

What are some alternatives?

When comparing grab-site and wget-lua you can also consider the following projects:

ArchiveBox - 🗃 Open source self-hosted web archiving. Takes URLs/browser history/bookmarks/Pocket/Pinboard/etc., saves HTML, JS, PDFs, media, and more...

7-Zip-zstd - 7-Zip with support for Brotli, Fast-LZMA2, Lizard, LZ4, LZ5 and Zstandard

browsertrix-crawler - Run a high-fidelity browser-based crawler in a single Docker container

libarchive - Multi-format archive and compression library

docker-swag - Nginx webserver and reverse proxy with php support and a built-in Certbot (Let's Encrypt) client. It also contains fail2ban for intrusion prevention.

Crawly - Crawly, a high-level web crawling & scraping framework for Elixir.

awesome-datahoarding - List of data-hoarding related tools

wpull - Wget-compatible web downloader and crawler.

replayweb.page - Serverless replay of web archives directly in the browser

os - Tiny Linux distro that runs the entire OS as Docker containers