gpustat VS bottom

My favorite would be gpustat [1]. This shows the bare minimum amount of information to let's me know that the training has problems/running well

[1] https://github.com/wookayin/gpustat

I have also tried gpustat(https://github.com/wookayin/gpustat) it still does not give me the process ids running.I get the following error

Do you have steam or other gaming platforms installed? There may be another service using ram. You could also check the ram with a cli tool https://github.com/wookayin/gpustat

You can compare your CPU and GPU loads. For nvidia you can use gpustat or nvidia-smi I guess. For intel there is intel_gpu_top.

I created a webapp for monitoring the GPU machines I am working with. Maybe it will be useful to someone else here. The app aggregates the output from gpustat across all machines and displays them on a single page.

I personally like gpustat -- it's a nvidia-smi wrapper but it has colors...

They also i guess now have a web sever plugged into it which seems pretty cool

https://github.com/wookayin/gpustat

Did you try gpustat?

bottom

I'd suggest Bottom as a TUI alternative to the in-built task managers - https://github.com/ClementTsang/bottom

It works on Windows also.

If anyone is looking for a "top" like, written in Rust, might have a look at https://github.com/ClementTsang/bottom

Looks like bottom with another theme

bottom - A cross-platform graphical process/system monitor with a customizable interface and a multitude of features.

As a macOS user, it boils my brain whenever I've to type in something like ~/Library/Application Support/org.rust-lang.Cargo/config.toml. macOS users have been begging CLI tools to support XDG variables on macOS too. Setting defaults is a strong indication to the community what should be the "preferred" locations. The defaults defined in your article will invariably lead to some authors saying that if that path is good enough for cargo, then it is good enough for their tool. Even the latest draft RFC acknowledges that macOS should use XDG variables too. I've written more about this here.