gpt-generated-commit-messages VS gptel

The past week I used GPT for about 80% of my commit messages. I put it in a terminal command so all I type is 'commit' and that's equivalent to: git add . && git commit -m "message" && git push.

The message is generated automatically via the GPT API.

I made it public in case anyone else wants to try/use/fork it:

https://github.com/stevecondylios/gpt-generated-commit-messa...

It's very convenient for README and docs changes; small changes whose commit message really doesn't matter.

Emacs is able to run prompts, just like any other tool that's able to make an HTTP request. E.g., https://github.com/karthink/gptel provides hooks to both OpenAI and local LLMs, and allows you to use them anywhere—since everything in Emacs is a buffer.

There are some pretty great examples in the README.

Also worth checking out for more general use of LLMs in emacs: https://github.com/karthink/gptel

gptel: An LLM chat client for Emacs, supports ChatGPT and local LLMs (via Ollama, GPT4All or llama.cpp)

That would be great, though ChatGPT seems to prefer Markdown even when org is requested. Didn't want to fight it too much. Did you manage to get a reliable prompt, or if I'm understanding correctly gptel converts Markdown to Org?

I use https://github.com/karthink/gptel to talk to GPT in Emacs and, by extension, have a record of all my conversations (unless intentionally removed) as simple Org files in my single Org-Roam network.

It made me a working function on the first try. (sorry, I lost the exact prompt, I just ran gptel from my scratch buffer)