gomponents VS web.dev

I'm really happy you like it. :) And thank you for your comment, I really appreciate newcomer viewpoints especially.

Have a look at the `Classes` helper component already available: https://github.com/maragudk/gomponents/blob/main/components/...

Yeah, I'm not a total fan of the runtime panics, but it was a tradeoff where I chose in favour of API simplicity and readability. In practice, it works out well, because you catch any typos at development time.

I've had elements and attributes in separate packages before, but then you can't dot-import both packages and not have name clashes, and have to either prefix elements or attributes with the package name, which makes the code much less readable. Again, a tradeoff. :)

Gomponents:

I now always use https://github.com/maragudk/gomponents for frontend components (I'm the author of that library) together with HTMX (https://github.com/maragudk/gomponents-htmx), and it's just so much more fun and fast to work with.

However, there is an alternative to achieve React-ish components in Go using this package: https://github.com/maragudk/gomponents

reminds me of https://github.com/maragudk/gomponents

I’ve also started just rendering views from the Go backend. It’s so nice and simple when you don’t need an SPA (like in your case). I didn’t like the syntax of html/template though, so I started a small view component library. Maybe it would be useful to you too, wrote about it here: https://www.maragu.dk/blog/gomponents-declarative-view-components-in-go/

Are you speaking of something like: gomponents? I can see what it has to offer. I tried it for half an hour but did not feel that well about it.

Before we start creating pages in our application, it's important to understand how Next.js renders content. The framework supports multiple rendering methods including server-side rendering (SSR), static site rendering (SSG), and client-side rendering (CSR). There are many pros and cons to each rendering method (too many to cover in this post) so if these concepts are new to you, Google’s web.dev site has a very good introduction to rendering on the web that can help you understand rendering options.

The lifecycle of an interaction. Source: web.dev

Probably not, it's the CSS used so far, so if there are elements you've not interacted with, that's an issue. This web.dev article gives some tools you can use https://web.dev/articles/extract-critical-css

I noticed the same for Google's site https://web.dev/

The last article pushed to the feed was "Changes to the web.dev infrastructure" few months ago https://web.dev/blog/webdev-migration

The feed still there but with no updates https://web.dev/feed.xml and on the site you can see new articles published.

Is sad that on a infrastructure revamp of a modern site, the RSS feed was left out of the features list (at least for now).

Upon testing on Firefox and Mi Browser, there was no triggering of the BeforeInstallPrompt event, as expected. However, I noticed that web.dev manages to display a prompt on these browsers, even though they theoretically lack support for the BeforeInstallPrompt event.

web.dev, maintained by Google, including posts by Chrome developers and their co-workers,

In a old web.dev articleI came across the word "Incremental (Re)Hydration" which is linked to a Glimmer.js-Blog post (also called "Incremental Rendering" there) confuses me. Is Incremental (Re)Hydration the same as Progressive (Re)Hydration? Reading the Glimmer-Blog article it seems so, but in the web.devarticle it seems to be something different.

Web.dev newsletter - though it's not a weekly newsletter and it's only content from web.dev (though really high quality content)

Just open up a text edi web developers are self-taught. a website. That's what I did. Some people like this: https://web.dev