godnsbench VS AdGuardHome

You can just benchmark it yourself https://github.com/ameshkov/godnsbench, Europe is big™️, for all we know there might be a NextDNS/AdGuard POP right in your ISP

It doesn't really matter. using https://github.com/ameshkov/godnsbench, the result of godnsbench -a https://dns.adguard.com/dns-query -p 10 -c 1000 is

Benchmark it https://github.com/ameshkov/godnsbench your ISP is different from the other after all

Benchmark it yourself. DoQ in theory should have less overhead, but whether that's even measurable let alone noticeable isn't clear.

Run https://github.com/ameshkov/godnsbench from your own device to compare the provider performance, anyone else have different route to the nearest server.

Here you are: https://github.com/ameshkov/godnsbench

Also AdGuardhome will use optimistic caching, which is great.

https://github.com/AdguardTeam/AdGuardHome/discussions/4002#...

The main repo is GPLv3: https://github.com/AdguardTeam/AdGuardHome

They already have many other commercials products and I guess also the default filter rules are very good because of their experience in the domain.

But I think you can use it completely without the AdGuard servers and use other filter list sources.

How it compares to let's say AdGuard Home? Seems similar https://github.com/AdguardTeam/AdGuardHome

Adguardhome - Clients identification issue

You can check this documentation if you want to investigate further: https://github.com/AdguardTeam/AdGuardHome/wiki/Hosts-Blocklists

I'm using adguardhome v0.107.42 openwrt snapshot on linksys wrt1900ac v2, but when using DoH it won't resolve upstream DNS, but DoT is works perfectly OK, I've already set allow_unencrypted_doh to true in config .yaml file as per instruction here

AdGuard Home?

https://github.com/AdguardTeam/AdGuardHome

Regarding open source, AdGuard DNS actually is:

How does this compare to adguard home [ https://github.com/AdguardTeam/AdguardHome ] ??

Have you looked at AdGuard Home - Configuring clients?