go_clean_architecture
Go Clean Architecture Used at @wesionaryteam (by wesionaryTEAM)
gitlab
By gitlab-org
go_clean_architecture | gitlab | |
---|---|---|
1 | 448 | |
120 | - | |
5.9% | - | |
7.9 | - | |
about 14 hours ago | - | |
Go | ||
Apache License 2.0 | - |
The number of mentions indicates the total number of mentions that we've tracked plus the number of user suggested alternatives.
Stars - the number of stars that a project has on GitHub. Growth - month over month growth in stars.
Activity is a relative number indicating how actively a project is being developed. Recent commits have higher weight than older ones.
For example, an activity of 9.0 indicates that a project is amongst the top 10% of the most actively developed projects that we are tracking.
Stars - the number of stars that a project has on GitHub. Growth - month over month growth in stars.
Activity is a relative number indicating how actively a project is being developed. Recent commits have higher weight than older ones.
For example, an activity of 9.0 indicates that a project is amongst the top 10% of the most actively developed projects that we are tracking.
go_clean_architecture
Posts with mentions or reviews of go_clean_architecture.
We have used some of these posts to build our list of alternatives
and similar projects. The last one was on 2023-01-28.
-
Best front-end stack for Golang backend
First link has some syntax issues: https://github.com/wesionaryTEAM/go_clean_architecture
gitlab
Posts with mentions or reviews of gitlab.
We have used some of these posts to build our list of alternatives
and similar projects. The last one was on 2024-04-22.
-
Gitlab Duo
Since the relevant code appears to be in the "ee" directory <https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab/-/blob/v16.11.0-ee/ee/l...> and is not present in the foss repo, I'm guessing the answer is no, at least for now. They do have a history of "releasing" features from EE back to CE but my suspicion is not for LLM stuff
- Code Search Is Hard
- XZ Backdoor Investigation Request to Gitlab Team
-
Client side Git hooks 101
(Side note: Issues are usually hash-prefixed like #1234 both on GitLab and GitHub. However, commit messages must not begin with a hash, they would be considered a comment and ignored. Therefore, GitHub has introduced the alternative prefix GH- and I've contributed a similar prefix GL- to GitLab a while ago.)
- Assign Issue to an AI Developer
-
BuildKit in depth: Docker's build engine explained
and its "oh, you want multi-arch, do you?" friend. While prosecuting this <https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab/-/issues/339567> I learned that https://hub.docker.com/layers/multiarch/qemu-user-static/7.2... actually mutates the binfmt_misc in buildx's context in order to exec the static copy of qemu in it https://github.com/multiarch/qemu-user-static/blob/v7.2.0-1/...
and, that the buildx plugin itself has some qemu magick in it, which got addressed in a minor version bump but I couldn't track down the relevant GitHub issue this second (I've flushed it from my mind, only recalling that there were a lot of actors in that tire fire)
-
Gitlab password reset bug leaves more than 5.3K servers up for grabs
This is actually a follow-up refactor, the fix is here: https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab/-/commit/abe79e4ec43798...
- ExifTool CVE-2021-22204 – Arbitrary Code Execution
- Critical Gitlab vulnerability exposes 2FA-less users to account takeovers
- Upcoming critical Gitlab security issue