go-is-not-good
v
go-is-not-good | v | |
---|---|---|
10 | 219 | |
3,799 | 35,296 | |
- | 0.1% | |
0.0 | 9.9 | |
2 months ago | 4 days ago | |
Go | V | |
- | MIT License |
Stars - the number of stars that a project has on GitHub. Growth - month over month growth in stars.
Activity is a relative number indicating how actively a project is being developed. Recent commits have higher weight than older ones.
For example, an activity of 9.0 indicates that a project is amongst the top 10% of the most actively developed projects that we are tracking.
go-is-not-good
-
Rust ou GO?
Go is a poorly designed language
-
Carbon - an experimental C++ successor language
https://github.com/ksimka/go-is-not-good an entire repo dedicated to articles on the topic
- 怎么安全治疗脱发?
-
What is hard to create in other languages but easy in Go?
Really? Fine https://github.com/golang/go/issues/31500 or https://github.com/ksimka/go-is-not-good In the end, this was a playful comment ^^ Let's not take life too seriously.
-
Apparently, all those tiny NPM packages are also debian packages...
I'm not very interested in going on a rant about specific APIs, since there are a lot of them. I'm sure one or more of these have talked about it.
-
Seriously, what's the point?
Problems with golang: https://github.com/ksimka/go-is-not-good
- Why Go Is Not Good
-
Bored programmer after two decades
Lots of other people feel the same so I won't repeat it. There is a whole git repo about why go sucks: https://github.com/ksimka/go-is-not-good
- A computer scientist in theory should be able to design a programming language such as Python which you use. So keep that in mind 😉
-
Introducing an open-source database to build end-to-end secured applications (and so much more)
Here's a selection of some of the reasons why.
v
-
V Language Review (2023)
Their site is clearly showing the language is in beta. The V documentation also states that autofree is WIP, and to use the GC instead. This isn't a corporate created language, but looks to be a true volunteer open source effort from people around the world.
Their community, in comparison to others, even has their discussions open and open threads for criticism[1]. These
[1]https://github.com/vlang/v/discussions/7610
-
Towards memory safety with ownership checks for C
V also has this https://github.com/vlang/v/blob/master/doc/docs.md#embed_fil...
- Vlang Release v0.4.4
- Vox: Upcoming open-source browser engine in V
- Building a web blog in V & SQLite
- bultin_write_buf_to_fd_should_use_c_write
- The V Machine Learning Roadmap and Ecosystem
-
Show HN: A new stdlib for Golang focusing on platform native support
Goroutines was the selling point for me until they decided to introduce telemetry in their toolchain; that was what forced me to stop using Golang as a whole.
About GC, I would say: if you implement C++'s RAII mechanism to replace garbage collection, then I believe this project will have a bright future.
My final question is the following: how `pcz` compares to V language, from a syntax's perspective [1]?
[1] https://github.com/vlang/v
- Hopefully, the V developers will establish a relationship with Microsoft.
-
The V Programming Language 0.4
V has the right to exist, have its supporters, and do things its own way. The creator and developers of V, from what I have seen, has always responded well to constructive criticism. Their language has discussions opened at their GitHub, unlike those for various other languages. They even have a thread for what people don't like and want improved about the language[1], again, something many other languages don't have.
A lot of what was going on initially, was coming from obvious competitors, to include being uncivil, inflammatory, and insulting. The initial "criticism" was not so much that, but false accusations of the language being a scam, vaporware, fraud, or didn't really exist. To include attacks and jealousy about its funding and having supporters. This was not any kind of "valid" criticism, that the creator or contributors of the language could reason about.
The "criticism" never died down, but rather after V was open-sourced and established itself on GitHub. The initial series of false accusations could not stand nor could the support it was getting be stopped. So, the rhetoric and targets shifted to whatever could be found to go after on the newly released alpha version of the language and its new website. In that new mix of what was being thrown at it, there were indeed some very valid criticisms, as can be found with any new language.
Constructive and valid criticism, is not the same as insults, trolling, misinformation, rivalry, or false accusations. There is clearly a difference. It's disingenuous to pretend something from one group is the same as the other, or that the intent behind what is being done is not different.
[1] https://github.com/vlang/v/discussions/7610
What are some alternatives?
fasthttp - Fast HTTP package for Go. Tuned for high performance. Zero memory allocations in hot paths. Up to 10x faster than net/http
zig - General-purpose programming language and toolchain for maintaining robust, optimal, and reusable software.
usbarmory - USB armory - The open source compact secure computer
go - The Go programming language
vala-www - Website of the Vala programming language
Odin - Odin Programming Language
Tango-D2 - A port of the Tango library to D2
Nim - Nim is a statically typed compiled systems programming language. It combines successful concepts from mature languages like Python, Ada and Modula. Its design focuses on efficiency, expressiveness, and elegance (in that order of priority).
crates.io - The Rust package registry
sokol - minimal cross-platform standalone C headers
RustPython - A Python Interpreter written in Rust
hn-search - Hacker News Search