gnuplotlib VS eazy-gnuplot

Looks great, minor API usability note: I don't know if there is an official convention but when naming an object that has the potential of overriding a builtin, rather than prepending with an underscore, e.g. `_with`, one does append to it: `with_`. The former is used and recognised for unused variables.

> _with is a curve option that indicates how this dataset should be plotted. It’s _with and not with because the latter is a built-in keyword in Python. [1]

- [1] https://github.com/dkogan/gnuplotlib/blob/master/guide/guide...

Having just compared this to a Common Lisp library that does the same thing [0], given Python's prominance in numerical computing, Im actually surprised that the latter is better.

[0] http://guicho271828.github.io/eazy-gnuplot/

I am using eazy-gnuplot for some simple plotting. One of the plots is 3d and I want to be able to rotate the viewpoint. I can do this in gnuplot (see here for the gnuplot command) by setting the "view". In eazy-gnuplot this is done with gp :set :view ... where the ellipsis is the problem. Looking at the examples here: cookbook (see In[62]) I should be able to specify a list with a special character for the comma, e.g. (gp :set :view '(29 #\, 53)) but this always gives me the error because, I think, it fails to type check as a number. If I do (gp :set :view 29) things work.