gnu-parallel VS wttr.in

You can use GNU Parallel (https://www.gnu.org/software/parallel/) to run command-line clients with all of those queries. You can set up the upper limit of simultaneous clients run, and this will automatically handle all possible parallelism.

Some other multi machine options that have worked well for me, well beyond just compilation of C/C++ on multiple machines with multiple cores.

1) set up passwordless, ssh.

and

2) use the gnu parallel. https://www.gnu.org/software/parallel/

gnu parallel is super flexible, very useful.

How does this stack up againg GNU parallel? If you just wanna parallelize CLI work-loads (like nmap), parallel should be easier, I guess.

It requires jq for JSON processing and GNU parallel for concurrent searches in the notebooks.

Since you've got lots of images, you could use GNU Parallel to spread the job across multiple CPUs.

Gnu parallel

You could easily use something like GNU Parallel:

https://www.gnu.org/software/parallel/

wttr.in is unfortunately not accurate in many cities in the world, check their github issues

The difference with weafetch is that it has its own config file which can just be configured and not touched anymore. When using wttr.in with curl, any custom changes you want to get from the output will need to be typed in everytime.

What about https://wttr.in/ ?

The source of the data that are presented: https://github.com/chubin/wttr.in

I don't recommend using wttr.io at all, their current provider shows inaccurate information for many cities, including Berlin. (source)

Oups the last link was incorrect it should have been https://github.com/chubin/wttr.in. I pull the info and store it in a txt file then I reference with cat or sed. That way it's super quick.

See https://github.com/chubin/wttr.in