gitui VS bottom

I was missing interactive rebase, as it is missing from libgit2

https://github.com/extrawurst/gitui/issues/32

I have this feeling with all rust apps using crossterm crate as their backend like GitUI for example

GitUI is a terminal UI for git written in Rust. We aim to simplify common git tasks in a fast, keyboard-only and cross platform way without leaving your beloved CLI.

The terminal applications I used are GitUi and LazyGit. Both are very good and have almost all what you need.

Give gitui a try. It’s a text|terminal user interface (tui) for git. I think that’s what you are looking for. Also, search GitHub for “git tui” and I’m sure you will find a bunch of other options.

bottom

I'd suggest Bottom as a TUI alternative to the in-built task managers - https://github.com/ClementTsang/bottom

It works on Windows also.

If anyone is looking for a "top" like, written in Rust, might have a look at https://github.com/ClementTsang/bottom

Looks like bottom with another theme

bottom - A cross-platform graphical process/system monitor with a customizable interface and a multitude of features.

As a macOS user, it boils my brain whenever I've to type in something like ~/Library/Application Support/org.rust-lang.Cargo/config.toml. macOS users have been begging CLI tools to support XDG variables on macOS too. Setting defaults is a strong indication to the community what should be the "preferred" locations. The defaults defined in your article will invariably lead to some authors saying that if that path is good enough for cargo, then it is good enough for their tool. Even the latest draft RFC acknowledges that macOS should use XDG variables too. I've written more about this here.