gimp
firejail
gimp | firejail | |
---|---|---|
26 | 139 | |
4,556 | 5,449 | |
1.3% | - | |
9.9 | 9.7 | |
3 days ago | 6 days ago | |
C | C | |
GNU General Public License v3.0 or later | GNU General Public License v3.0 only |
Stars - the number of stars that a project has on GitHub. Growth - month over month growth in stars.
Activity is a relative number indicating how actively a project is being developed. Recent commits have higher weight than older ones.
For example, an activity of 9.0 indicates that a project is amongst the top 10% of the most actively developed projects that we are tracking.
gimp
- The KDE desktop gets an overhaul with Plasma 6
-
C++ is everywhere, but noone really talks about it. What are people's thoughts?
GIMP: C, not C++
-
What are some OpenSource apps that are the best of their kind?
GIMP - https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/gimp
-
I love the simplicity of gnome apps, what are some of the best in your opinion?
GIMP
-
How can I implement an interactive canvas?
How are they implement? https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/gimp https://github.com/figma
-
User friendly interface
As u/schumaml said already, we have an issue tracker: https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/gimp/
-
Color issue exporting to PDF
The former might be something you want to report as an issue at https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/gimp, with the XCF file used for your cover image - or a mockup exhibiting the same issue - attached.
-
Gimp's Colorize Function
As Gimp is open source, I already had a look in the source code but it's written in C, which is different enough from C++ or C# that I have a rather difficult time understanding it, at least in terms of project structure. I'm pretty sure I found the handling of the tool itself in gimpoperationcolorize.c but I don't know where to go from here.
-
Gimp 3 Beta Released
> Gotta be real, Gimp's not that far off from just one guy (https://github.com/GNOME/gimp/graphs/contributors)
GitHub only shows people with an email address linked to a GitHub account in that chart; the last time I checked it was 4 or 5 people working on it regularly, which is still a very small team (none are working on it full-time) so your point still stands (it's a point I've made myself a few times before when people compare GIMP to Photoshop or the like).
-
[Meta] Remove the Proprietary Automod already
Maybe not the best example. The one on github is just a mirror of this one.
firejail
-
Sandboxing All the Things with Flatpak and BubbleBox
bubblewrap is designed as a low-level too. There is nothing quick and dirty about it. It disallows everything by default and you have to be explicit about what you want to share with the host. If your application needs complex permissions/resources, then you will need to have a complex bubblewrap command line.
Once you have figured out which permissions/resources you need for a given program, you can wrap the command line invocation in a shell script.
If you want other people to do the work of defining permissions/resources, then have a look at firejail: https://github.com/netblue30/firejail
-
Ask HN: What are some unpopular technologies you wish people knew more about?
Firejail is cool: https://github.com/netblue30/firejail
Linux namespaces/cgroups but nowhere near as heavy as Docker.
I use it when I want to limit the memory of a Python script:
```
-
Toolship: A (More) Secure Workstation
Firejail can also be a useful option, though no good if you're on Mac https://firejail.wordpress.com/
Uses the same Linux primitives as docker etc, but can be a bit more ergonomic for this use case
-
Firejail: Light, featureful and zero-dependency security sandbox for Linux
Firejail, Flatpak (which uses Bubblewrap under the hood), and Snap (which uses AppArmor) all use the same underlying technology: Linux namespaces.
This question comes up a lot, and has been answered here: https://github.com/netblue30/firejail/wiki/Frequently-Asked-...
TL;DR: Firejail has much more comprehensive features than Flatpak (Bubblewrap). Firejail also has more comprehensive network support, support for AppArmor and SELinux, and easier seccomp filtering.
Compared to Snap (which uses AppArmor), Firejail is compatible with AppArmor and again goes above and beyond with a lot of additional features.
-
Bubblewrap – Low-level unprivileged sandboxing tool used by Flatpak
Wonderful little tool, too bad you must chain various exec calling tools to get cgroups (a bit akin to `ionice ... nice ... cmd`) and Linux users namespaces can't allow UNIX sockets while preventing network access (I think?).
Migrated from Firejail when its complexity annoyed me too much and I hit https://github.com/netblue30/firejail/issues/3001 (Firejail doesn't like parens or brackets in --put/--get parameters) to a badly NIH version using bwrap and bash to have "profiles":
- Firejail: Light featureful and zero-dependency security sandbox for Linux
-
Do, or do not. There is no try
Firejail does this. The profile database is the two "profile" directories in https://github.com/netblue30/firejail/tree/master/etc
-
Strange times make for strange friends...
What do you mean by a Firefox container? Do you mean FireJail?
What are some alternatives?
glimpse-nx-design - Designs for Glimpse Image Editor and Glimpse NX
bubblewrap - Low-level unprivileged sandboxing tool used by Flatpak and similar projects
gmic - GREYC's Magic for Image Computing: A Full-Featured Open-Source Framework for Image Processing
flatpak - Linux application sandboxing and distribution framework
openoffice - Apache OpenOffice
bubblejail - Bubblewrap based sandboxing for desktop applications
util-linux
Flatseal - Manage Flatpak permissions
VideoLAN Client (VLC) - VLC media player - All pull requests are ignored, please follow https://wiki.videolan.org/Sending_Patches_VLC/
yabai - A tiling window manager for macOS based on binary space partitioning
shallow-backup - Git-integrated backup tool for macOS and Linux devs.
podman - Podman: A tool for managing OCI containers and pods.