ggwave VS papiro

Compare ggwave vs papiro and see what are their differences.

Our great sponsors
  • WorkOS - The modern identity platform for B2B SaaS
  • InfluxDB - Power Real-Time Data Analytics at Scale
  • SaaSHub - Software Alternatives and Reviews
ggwave papiro
37 7
1,849 28
- -
4.4 2.2
3 months ago 8 months ago
C++ Shell
MIT License -
The number of mentions indicates the total number of mentions that we've tracked plus the number of user suggested alternatives.
Stars - the number of stars that a project has on GitHub. Growth - month over month growth in stars.
Activity is a relative number indicating how actively a project is being developed. Recent commits have higher weight than older ones.
For example, an activity of 9.0 indicates that a project is amongst the top 10% of the most actively developed projects that we are tracking.

ggwave

Posts with mentions or reviews of ggwave. We have used some of these posts to build our list of alternatives and similar projects. The last one was on 2023-04-30.

papiro

Posts with mentions or reviews of papiro. We have used some of these posts to build our list of alternatives and similar projects. The last one was on 2021-12-11.

What are some alternatives?

When comparing ggwave and papiro you can also consider the following projects:

minimodem - general-purpose software audio FSK modem

tagreader - Simple to build/use NFC tag reader, specially created for Home Assistant

wave-share - Serverless, peer-to-peer, local file sharing through sound

quiet - Transmit data with sound. Includes binaries for soundcards and .wav files.

amodem - Audio MODEM Communication Library in Python

linki_players

quiet-js - Transmit data with sound using Web Audio -- Javascript binding for libquiet

chirppy - Play chirp.io chirps with Python

quietnet - Simple chat program that communicates using inaudible sounds