geogebra VS calc

https://github.com/geogebra/geogebra How can I obtain the source code for the Android platform and embed it into our own app with only the core layer code, DeskTop, and web platform source code? Thank you for your reply.

I don't think their codebases are particularly connected: AFAIK Desmos is a client-side browser app, so the software is distributed to the user for using in that way, which seems incompatible with the GPL3+ licensing of the GeoGebra codebase.

https://github.com/geogebra/geogebra

Edit: while learning derivatives you should definitely play around with a graphing calculator like https://www.geogebra.org/ . It will make understanding what's going on a lot more intuitive.

There are a lot of different cases, it's quite tricky. Here's the numerical algorithm in full https://github.com/geogebra/geogebra/blob/master/common/src/main/java/org/geogebra/common/kernel/algos/AlgoIntersectConics.java

Access to XMLHttpRequest at 'https://example.com/files' from origin 'https://www.geogebra.org' has been blocked by CORS policy: No 'Access-Control-Allow-Origin' header is present on the requested resource.

It's very simple and should stay that way - changing it would probably add bugs https://github.com/geogebra/geogebra/blob/master/common/src/main/java/org/geogebra/common/kernel/advanced/AlgoDynamicCoordinates.java

Can you redraw this on something like Geogebra and post a screenshot with the relevant points? Can you also explain where the circles come from and/or why you can just use trig?

There are some decent physics examples built out in Geogebra that you might be able to use directly or modify. https://www.geogebra.org/

http://www.isthe.com/chongo/tech/comp/calc/index.html not sure why you chose exactly the same name as the original calc. Even if you plan to create a drop in replacement. It's not good practise to use exactly the same name than another active project in the same problem domain

my benchmarks againts qalc and c-calc shows that c-calc takes about 0.8ms mean to run a calculation,qalc takes about 96.4ms to run a calculation,and mine takes 0.5ms to run a calculation, of course this is pretty much just the startup time however i cant measure the runtime speed againts c-calc because it does not allow multiple arguments like mine does.

I like calc myself, works quite well. Doesn't have e preloaded as a constant, to my knowledge at least, but otherwise it is very good.

calc: a command line calculator with arbitrary precision. GNU bc is good too, but calc has more built-in commands (combinatorial, number theory functions for example). You can use it interactively, or simply to provide the results of a calculation. Try this: in your terminal, enter

There's also another calc: https://github.com/lcn2/calc