gecode VS Google Test

Sure, there are lots but I think it should be doable. Will probably try sometime. Easiest is to make a model that fixes the lengths of the words, and just run it for different word lengths.

As a comparison, see this model solving crosswords using constraint programming. https://github.com/Gecode/gecode/blob/develop/examples/cross...

The main idea is that one defines tests that post the propagator on an initial domain, and then adding a checker for ground instances if it is a solution. The testing infrastructure runs the propagator in simulated setting, making sure that non-solutions are pruned and that solutions are found. Here is an example for the sorted constraint: sorted.cpp

cmake_minimum_required(VERSION 3.5) project(knn_cpp CXX) include(FetchContent) FetchContent_Declare( googletest GIT_REPOSITORY https://github.com/google/googletest.git GIT_TAG release-1.11.0 ) FetchContent_MakeAvailable(googletest) FetchContent_Declare(matplotplusplus GIT_REPOSITORY https://github.com/alandefreitas/matplotplusplus GIT_TAG origin/master) FetchContent_GetProperties(matplotplusplus) if(NOT matplotplusplus_POPULATED) FetchContent_Populate(matplotplusplus) add_subdirectory(${matplotplusplus_SOURCE_DIR} ${matplotplusplus_BINARY_DIR} EXCLUDE_FROM_ALL) endif() function(knn_cpp_test TEST_NAME TEST_SOURCE) add_executable(${TEST_NAME} ${TEST_SOURCE}) target_link_libraries(${TEST_NAME} PUBLIC matplot) aux_source_directory(${CMAKE_CURRENT_SOURCE_DIR}/../lib LIB_SOURCES) target_link_libraries(${TEST_NAME} PRIVATE gtest gtest_main gmock gmock_main) target_include_directories(${TEST_NAME} PRIVATE ${CMAKE_CURRENT_SOURCE_DIR} ${CMAKE_CURRENT_SOURCE_DIR}/../) target_sources(${TEST_NAME} PRIVATE ${LIB_SOURCES} ) include(GoogleTest) gtest_discover_tests(${TEST_NAME}) endfunction() knn_cpp_test(LinearAlgebraTest la_test.cc) knn_cpp_test(KnnTest knn_test.cc) knn_cpp_test(UtilsTest utils_test.cc)

Okay, time to start unit tests!!! We will use Unity Test Framework to do unit testing. It is one of widely used testing frameworks alongside with Check, Google Test etc. Just downloading source code, and putting it to the project folder is enough to make it work (that is also why it is portable).

Updating GCC (it happened to GoogleTest).

Roy's project uses Google Test, a C++ testing framework. His testing setup is similar to mine as we both keep source files in one directory and tests in another. The key difference is that I can run the tests using the Visual Studios run button. It was fairly easy to write the new tests as there were existing ones that I could reference to check the syntax!

The Google Test Documentation provides a primer for first-time users. The primer introduces some basic concepts and terminology, some of which I've been able to learn for this lab exercise.

> git submodule add https://github.com/google/googletest.git > git submodule update --init --recursive

cmake_minimum_required(VERSION 3.14) project(my_project) # GoogleTest requires at least C++14 set(CMAKE_CXX_STANDARD 14) set(CMAKE_CXX_STANDARD_REQUIRED ON) include(FetchContent) FetchContent_Declare( googletest URL https://github.com/google/googletest/archive/03597a01ee50ed33e9dfd640b249b4be3799d395.zip ) # For Windows: Prevent overriding the parent project's compiler/linker settings set(gtest_force_shared_crt ON CACHE BOOL "" FORCE) FetchContent_MakeAvailable(googletest) enable_testing() add_executable( hello_test hello_test.cpp ) target_link_libraries( hello_test GTest::gtest_main ) include(GoogleTest) gtest_discover_tests(hello_test)

FetchContent\_Declare(googletestGIT\_REPOSITORY [[email protected]](mailto:[email protected]):googletest.git [https://github.com/google/googletest.git](https://github.com/google/googletest.git)GIT\_TAG release-1.12.1)FetchContent\_MakeAvailable(googletest)

Not sure about CppUnit but I can speak to my previous experience using the googletest framework which compiles your tests to an executable, and since it's a very simple framework we were able to cross-compile and run directly on our device. We just had to hook up a device to the server that was running the CI so it could flash it when needed. That basically meant that our process was: