g0bin VS Freenet

So on to the UI: I see that you're not serving Javascript and advising that your users turn it off. IMO fear of real Javascript exploitation is largely based on tradition rather than a rational assessment of the real risk areas, but I'll assume that's your reason for not using any of the PrivateBin clones which offer browser-side encryption in addition to client-side encryption, the original, the pure-js one, the Go one. I get it. I don't expect people to trust the JavaScript I serve them either, my own opinions on the risk notwithstanding, so I don't bother with a PrivateBin clone either. But I don't advertise some model of privacy on my pastebin. It's very clear that the files aren't encrypted unless you encrypt them(But passwords are only in hash form if a password configured by the user) to avoid imparting a false sense of security.

From the FreeNet Site

You are linking "original Freenet" to a PDF on freenet.org instead of linking to freenetproject.org ?

release-tag with the download and additional information: https://github.com/hyphanet/fred/releases/tag/build01497

It clashes with the Freenet project https://freenetproject.org/

Instead of use of Blockchain you could also use Freenet . The only bad thing here data could be lost, but mostly only data is lost when not used. This could be used to auto purge forks that most people dislike. If for example some reason there are multiple alternatives how the story goes some of them will die after a while and removed from system.

An automatically space balancing solution would be Freenet. Given that it's content addressing, it's possible to push data into it and have it deduplicate automatically.

fred: https://github.com/freenet/fred