Freenet VS i2p.i2p

From the FreeNet Site

You are linking "original Freenet" to a PDF on freenet.org instead of linking to freenetproject.org ?

release-tag with the download and additional information: https://github.com/hyphanet/fred/releases/tag/build01497

It clashes with the Freenet project https://freenetproject.org/

Instead of use of Blockchain you could also use Freenet . The only bad thing here data could be lost, but mostly only data is lost when not used. This could be used to auto purge forks that most people dislike. If for example some reason there are multiple alternatives how the story goes some of them will die after a while and removed from system.

An automatically space balancing solution would be Freenet. Given that it's content addressing, it's possible to push data into it and have it deduplicate automatically.

fred: https://github.com/freenet/fred

How to setup I2P | How to setup Tor

This appears to link to the C++ version of I2P. Not the original "Official" Java version which is more complex and has much more built-in features: https://geti2p.net

> anonymous P2P encrypted communication platform (that doesn't require anything like a phone number for creating an account)

You mean https://geti2p.net?

It is not sufficient to serve the torrent files (or magnet links) anonymously: you will leak your IP unless you also download the actual files through darknet. However, Tor project does not recommend to use Tor for that: https://support.torproject.org/#misc_misc-4.

The actual solution is torrenting through I2P: https://geti2p.net. They support it out of the box and there are a few good trackers.

I've tried it from scratch, and it does indeed work on Parrot. I used the Debian apt repo on geti2p.net website.

I recently decided to setup I2P on a Raspberry Pi, so I installed the jar file listed on the geti2p.net on Linux. When I went into the directory where the other i2p files are I couldn't find the router.config file.

https://geti2p.net is real