fsv
git-appraise
fsv | git-appraise | |
---|---|---|
18 | 10 | |
495 | 5,097 | |
- | 0.1% | |
1.8 | 2.3 | |
about 3 years ago | 9 months ago | |
C | Go | |
GNU Lesser General Public License v3.0 only | Apache License 2.0 |
Stars - the number of stars that a project has on GitHub. Growth - month over month growth in stars.
Activity is a relative number indicating how actively a project is being developed. Recent commits have higher weight than older ones.
For example, an activity of 9.0 indicates that a project is amongst the top 10% of the most actively developed projects that we are tracking.
fsv
-
Sci-Fi Interfaces: Hackers (1995)
There's a modern clone of it now: https://fsv.sourceforge.net/
-
fsv
fsv is a file system visualizer for comprehensive exploration and analysis. Utilizes a 3D layout, with both MapV and TreeV views, to facilitate unique perspectives on file hierarchy. For viewing permissions, phein4242 says, "It doesnt get any better than FSN/FSV."
-
Interactive Map of Linux Kernel
Modern-ish version you can run on Linux: https://github.com/mcuelenaere/fsv
-
What movie did the "strong female" trope right?
For a modern take on it: https://fsv.sourceforge.net/
-
What have we lost? (Demo of exotic OSes – Genera, Interlisp, BTRON, IBM I)
With the upgrades to WSL in Windows 11 you can run fsv[1] with minimal hassle and get the true UNIX experience[2].
1: http://fsv.sourceforge.net/
- What is a fact that you think barely anyone else knows?
-
First person Desktop environment.
Fun fact: this was a real application for IRIX, and there is an open-source clone of it.
-
[Jurrasic Park OG] Today i found out where this subreddit got its name....
There is fsv
-
Ah.. Yes. Military grade encryption.. Felicity from Arrow knows best.
fsn was proprietary SGI software for Irix. But a free clone exists : http://fsv.sourceforge.net/
- What's the fastest way to open a file in Linux?
git-appraise
-
Gitlab's ActivityPub architecture blueprint
git-appraise[1] implements that concept. From Google, no less.
I've never used it, or seen it used in the wild, but it always seemed intriguing, and like the obvious approach. The web UI traction is far greater for this to have any serious usage, but I wonder if Git had that ability from the start, if the web UI concept would've taken off as it did.
[1]: https://github.com/google/git-appraise
- Git-appraise – Distributed Code Review for Git
-
git-appraise – Distributed Code Review for Git
I believe their docs cover the scenario of reviewing someone's code by pushing your review to the git repo, and others can use `git appraise list` to see open pull requests.
https://github.com/google/git-appraise/blob/master/docs/tuto...
A trivial git-hook could be setup for automating email notifications.
- Commit comments no longer appear in the pull request timeline
-
Show HN: OneDev – A Lightweight Gitlab Alternative
I know about Google’s gerrit. I now found https://github.com/google/git-appraise, there seems to be a plethora on the issue and pr tracking side.
Then the other day there was a generic/abstraction layer to write CI that abstracte over gitlab, circle ci, and GitHub actions (maybe more). I suppose all that’s left is to get some api tokens somewhere and go?
- Show HN: Crocodile Code Review
-
The Return of Fancy Tools
Experimenting with distributed issue trackers in git was popular in the early 2010s, there were a whole bunch of different implementations people came up with for git. Most of them died out though, there were typically a few problems - this is what I remember offhand from experimenting with a whole bunch of them:
* Some of them make a mess of some part of git; one of them put its info in separate git branches to ensure changes were always pushed/pulled even without a special push/pull command for the issue tracker.
* At least one of them kept their info in the repo in a dot-prefixed directory and auto added/committed the file as changes were made; this meant a single issue could be in different statuses depending on which branch you were on and there was no overarching view.
* The rest effectively ran in parallel to the git repo, pushing and pulling their data within it but requiring their own commands to do so, so it was totally possible to clone the repo and not get the issues.
* Most of them didn't have a non-repo way to track issues, for project managers and such. One did have a webview that ran from a repo, but it was up to you to figure out how to keep it in sync with the comments/etc devs were putting in their copies of the issue tracker.
Sibling mentions git-bug, a few others:
https://github.com/aaiyer/bugseverywhere (I think this is one of the original ones)
https://github.com/dspinellis/git-issue
https://github.com/neithernut/git-dit
https://github.com/google/git-appraise (I think this one is newest and I probably never tried it)
What are some alternatives?
SecLists - SecLists is the security tester's companion. It's a collection of multiple types of lists used during security assessments, collected in one place. List types include usernames, passwords, URLs, sensitive data patterns, fuzzing payloads, web shells, and many more.
git-dit - Decentralized Issue Tracking for git
plan9port - Plan 9 from User Space
onedev - Git Server with CI/CD, Kanban, and Packages. Seamless integration. Unparalleled experience.
taoup - The Tao of Unix Programming (Ruby-powered ANSI colored fortunes)
forgefed - ForgeFed - Federation Protocol for Forge Services
Shrine - A TempleOS distro for heretics
pull-request-stats - Github action to print relevant stats about Pull Request reviewers
panzoom - A library for panning and zooming elements using CSS transforms :mag:
git-from-the-bottom-up - An introduction to the architecture and design of the Git content manager
dmenu-extended - An extension to dmenu for quickly opening files and folders.
git-bug - Distributed, offline-first bug tracker embedded in git, with bridges