FS2 VS desktop

Recently, CE3 has had similar issues reported across multiple repositories, almost an epidemic of reports!

Thanks for the explanation!

So it's pull based and not push based like most other streams lib.

Does maybe someone know how this compares to FS2 or Iteratees than? (Both are also pull based streaming solutions).

https://fs2.io/#/

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Iteratee

Looks quite similar to me. Is the Scala FS2 lib maybe even a clones of the Haskell solution? Or are they different in important aspects?

Most important/known: * https://http4s.org/ - an HTTP client/server * https://github.com/typelevel/fs2 - streaming * https://github.com/tpolecat/doobie - JDBC

On the contrary, switching to the functional mindset, with something like Typelevel Scala3 and respective cats and cats-effect fs2 frameworks, helps to rethink a lot of designs and development approaches.

fs2 for streaming.

Finally, the last chapter has been rewritten to be based on some of the main design ideas from FS2 (https://fs2.io), which I hope will be more approachable than the 1st edition.

Just to clarify, is your doubt about the meaning of the api, or do you think you have found a bug? In either case, you can also open a Github discussion https://github.com/typelevel/fs2/discussions.

Another more reactive solution would to use signals, as in FPR sinal network. fs2 implements this very nicely here https://github.com/typelevel/fs2/blob/8b285a6b54c63d43ed6aa3bb91365652035c90e5/core/shared/src/main/scala/fs2/concurrent/Signal.scala

Assuming the bug mentioned here is https://github.com/typelevel/fs2/issues/2568, we came up with a partial fix in a day (https://github.com/typelevel/fs2/pull/2569) and a complete fix in 2 days: https://github.com/typelevel/fs2/pull/2572. Note the original bug was opened on a Saturday. :)

Congrats on the launch! It's always exciting to see more competition in the version control space.

One question I have is whether you guys are better than:

https://desktop.github.com/

This seems to do the exact same thing, be free forever, and have a more mature GUI that is also easier to use than regular terminal git. In my firm, even with people who don't know how to code, they can use github desktop (since it babies you through the process of committing code.)

- Product designers for open-source hardware. Various design files, SVG etc.

I’ve experimented with a “GUI only” git flow - just to see what is possible, so I could introduce the concept to others.

I found GitHub desktop app (https://desktop.github.com/)did a great job of visually showing git flows and functions, but for a non-tech/programmming person, the tool would be daunting.

Curiosity what your suggested tech stack would be - sans Terminal…

just use github desktop its an open source tool https://desktop.github.com/

Download and install GitHub Desktop if you haven't already.

3️⃣ GitHub Desktop: A desktop application provided by GitHub that allows you to interact with Git repositories visually. It provides an easy way to clone repositories, commit changes, create branches, and push and pull changes. Website: https://desktop.github.com/

GitHub Desktop - much, much easier than installing and setting up Git yourself (free)

GitHub Desktop - Price: Free Git client for Mac that allows you to manage your GitHub repositories.