wg-access-server
wg-access-server
| wg-access-server | wg-access-server | |
|---|---|---|
| 10 | 14 | |
| 592 | 1,749 | |
| 0.2% | - | |
| 9.2 | 0.0 | |
| 8 days ago | 2 months ago | |
| Go | TypeScript | |
| MIT License | MIT License |
Stars - the number of stars that a project has on GitHub. Growth - month over month growth in stars.
Activity is a relative number indicating how actively a project is being developed. Recent commits have higher weight than older ones.
For example, an activity of 9.0 indicates that a project is amongst the top 10% of the most actively developed projects that we are tracking.
wg-access-server
-
Most overrated and most underrated selfhosted software, in your opinion?
My bad. Should have mentioned the updated fork of that image. This one: https://github.com/freifunkMUC/wg-access-server
-
Does a self-hosted, user-friendly VPN with an actual front-end exist?
wg-access-server is the best one I've found as well. Just a heads up, that repo is no longer being maintained but there's an active fork here: https://github.com/freifunkMUC/wg-access-server
- Wg-access-server: WireGuard VPN server and web UI for device management
- An all-in-one WireGuard VPN solution with a web ui for connecting devices
- GitHub - freifunkMUC/wg-access-server: An all-in-one WireGuard VPN solution with a web ui for connecting devices
- WireGuard Access server now supports IPv6
wg-access-server
-
Most overrated and most underrated selfhosted software, in your opinion?
I tried them all. I settled on wg-access-server.
-
A Primer: Accessing Services in Kubernetes
Yes, at my startup we run https://github.com/Place1/wg-access-server inside our kubernetes clusters to give engineers access to local pods vs the k8s DNS (.svc.cluster.local). It works relatively well but we've had to make a couple modifications:
1. I had to deploy CoreDNS to our cluster and set up DNS query rewriting to redirect queries from .cluster.mystartup to *.svc.cluster.local because docker on OS X has issues resolving hostnames that end in .local
-
An all-in-one WireGuard VPN solution with a web ui for connecting devices
What is the difference from https://github.com/Place1/wg-access-server ?
- Wg-access-server: An all-in-one WireGuard VPN solution with a web UI
-
Firezone, an open-source WireGuard-based alternative to OpenVPN
Not sure why this is downvoted. I use a similar service that runs in docker just fine. https://github.com/Place1/wg-access-server
- Netmaker 0.7 - Very Fast Linux Server Networking over WireGuard and Other Things
What are some alternatives?
docker-wireguard-pia - A Docker container for using Wireguard with PIA.
wg-gen-web - Simple Web based configuration generator for WireGuard
wireguard-ui - Wireguard web interface
wireguard-install - WireGuard VPN installer for Linux servers
WireGuard-Guide - WireGuard Guide. Learn all about WireGuard for Networking and in the Cloud (Microsoft Azure, AWS, and Google Cloud).
subspace - A simple WireGuard VPN server GUI
weg-easy
Nebula - A scalable overlay networking tool with a focus on performance, simplicity and security
Netmaker - Netmaker makes networks with WireGuard. Netmaker automates fast, secure, and distributed virtual networks.
firezone - Open-source VPN server and egress firewall for Linux built on WireGuard. Firezone is easy to set up (all dependencies are bundled thanks to Chef Omnibus), secure, performant, and self hostable.
tailscale - The easiest, most secure way to use WireGuard and 2FA.
docker-guacamole - A self-contained guacamole docker container for x64 and ARM. Remotely connect over SSH, RDP or VNC using HTML5.