format-benchmark
A collection of formatting benchmarks (by fmtlib)
boost_epoch
Proposal for an epoch-based organization of Boost libraries (by joaquintides)
| format-benchmark | boost_epoch | |
|---|---|---|
| 4 | 2 | |
| 42 | 6 | |
| - | - | |
| 4.7 | 10.0 | |
| 4 months ago | almost 4 years ago | |
| C++ | Python | |
| - | - |
The number of mentions indicates the total number of mentions that we've tracked plus the number of user suggested alternatives.
Stars - the number of stars that a project has on GitHub. Growth - month over month growth in stars.
Activity is a relative number indicating how actively a project is being developed. Recent commits have higher weight than older ones.
For example, an activity of 9.0 indicates that a project is amongst the top 10% of the most actively developed projects that we are tracking.
Stars - the number of stars that a project has on GitHub. Growth - month over month growth in stars.
Activity is a relative number indicating how actively a project is being developed. Recent commits have higher weight than older ones.
For example, an activity of 9.0 indicates that a project is amongst the top 10% of the most actively developed projects that we are tracking.
format-benchmark
Posts with mentions or reviews of format-benchmark.
We have used some of these posts to build our list of alternatives
and similar projects. The last one was on 2022-04-14.
-
Webinar: Algo Trading in C++20
Look, do I have to do all the work- go here https://github.com/fmtlib/format-benchmark tell me variadic templates are bad. It’s only 6 times faster than C — so yeah.
-
{fmt} 8.1.0 released with optimized chrono formatting, better support for ranges and other improvements
Would it be possible to update https://github.com/fmtlib/format-benchmark as well?
-
why is printf considered deprecated?
I don't know the reason, but you can certainly find benchmarks online. https://github.com/fmtlib/format-benchmark
- Would std::concat for strings be a good addition to the Standard Library?
boost_epoch
Posts with mentions or reviews of boost_epoch.
We have used some of these posts to build our list of alternatives
and similar projects. The last one was on 2022-04-14.
- Proposal for an epoch-based organization of Boost libraries
-
Webinar: Algo Trading in C++20
summarized here:https://www.reddit.com/r/cpp/comments/gfowpq/why_you_dont_use_boost/and here:https://github.com/joaquintides/boost_epoch/blob/master/README.md
What are some alternatives?
When comparing format-benchmark and boost_epoch you can also consider the following projects:
compiler-explorer - Run compilers interactively from your web browser and interact with the assembly
url - URL Standard
C++ Format - A modern formatting library
url - Boost.URL is a library for manipulating Uniform Resource Identifiers (URIs) and Locators (URLs).
papers - ISO/IEC JTC1 SC22 WG21 paper scheduling and management
papers
splinter - A series of patches (one per branch) on top of the Ninja project's codebase. Updated periodically.