flagsmith VS Laminar

Considering all these points, the team at Flagsmith has developed a feature flag management platform Flagsmith and made it open source. The core functionality is open and you can check out the GitHub repository here. I have utilized and authored several blogs discussing their excellent offerings and strategies.

It’s also open source! Check out the repo here and don't forget to give it a star to show your support and join their amazing community to get technical support.

In this guide, we've chosen Flagsmith as our feature flagging solution. Flagsmith is an open-source platform that offers a user-friendly interface for managing feature flags, A/B testing, and segment overrides. You can control feature behaviour without modifying code, making it a powerful tool for managing complex projects with multiple feature variations.

Looks good. My friend launched Flagsmith a few years back too -https://github.com/Flagsmith/flagsmith. I have used it on a few of my own projects and it’s been great/easy to integrate

Is Flagsmith not the de-facto OSS LaunchDarkly?

What are the differences to Flagr, GrowthBook or Flagsmith?

If you are curious about our performance, please check out our status page. If you want to support us, please give us a star on Github! If you need feature flags and want to partner with a team that is in it for the reasons I outlined above; feel free to sign up for a free account and give it a try!

I believe the idea is that you run feature flag management as a separate service. It's not meant for desktop software but rather as a component of a microservices architecture. This is not uncommon - I know at least one of the FAANGs has something like this internally.

Flagsmith [1] (formerly Bullet Train) is another open source feature-flags-as-a-service software, and they have their own SaaS offering now.

1. https://github.com/Flagsmith/flagsmith

*Laminar - I like how simple this is

I use Laminar CI for this: https://laminar.ohwg.net/

Delve into Laminar would be my suggestion.

I like Laminar as a lightweight, self-hosted CI solution.

For a lightweight solution, I like to recommend Laminar CI.

Laminar

Laminar is a lightweight and modular CI system licensed under GPLv3. I like that it allows me to build the CI solution that fits my given use case the best.

I find Laminar quite interesting in this space. It might help you too to build your own lightweight CI solution that does exactly what your use case requires.

My continuous integration / continuous deployoment system is based on Laminar CI (blog post series). It serves various purposes:

jftr: There is another project with this name which is deceptively similar, but also very different… (quoting the README): Laminar is a lightweight and modular Continuous Integration service for Linux. It is self-hosted and developer-friendly, eschewing a configuration UI in favour of simple version-controllable configuration files and scripts.