firewalld
firejail
firewalld | firejail | |
---|---|---|
6 | 139 | |
821 | 5,464 | |
2.1% | - | |
9.2 | 9.7 | |
3 days ago | 4 days ago | |
Python | C | |
GNU General Public License v3.0 only | GNU General Public License v3.0 only |
Stars - the number of stars that a project has on GitHub. Growth - month over month growth in stars.
Activity is a relative number indicating how actively a project is being developed. Recent commits have higher weight than older ones.
For example, an activity of 9.0 indicates that a project is amongst the top 10% of the most actively developed projects that we are tracking.
firewalld
-
WoW Dragonflight
For firewalld issue with WoW VoiceError:17, follow this link to see if the work around is helpful.
-
What do I do about this transaction error?
I think RPM wouldn't complain if you install an identical file to the one shipped by firewalld. That file requires the definition of ssdp, so it won't work for CentOS 7, but given you have a separate EL7 build, you could conditionalize that in the spec.
-
KDE Firewall Applet cannot find NetworkManager connection editor
Which package do I need to install? I can see support was added in a pull request called Support Plasma5-nm, but I guess at some stage plasma-nm stopt providing that binary.
-
Debian 11 'Bullseye' release planned on 2021-08-14
I filed an issue with firewalld. Hopefully they'll confirm it, point out what I did wrong, or tell me to report it to Debian!
- Firewalld v1.0 Released
-
Firewalls on Arch
That does not work per application. The "kdeconnect" profile, for example, just allows two specific ports that KDE Connect happens to use.
firejail
-
Sandboxing All the Things with Flatpak and BubbleBox
bubblewrap is designed as a low-level too. There is nothing quick and dirty about it. It disallows everything by default and you have to be explicit about what you want to share with the host. If your application needs complex permissions/resources, then you will need to have a complex bubblewrap command line.
Once you have figured out which permissions/resources you need for a given program, you can wrap the command line invocation in a shell script.
If you want other people to do the work of defining permissions/resources, then have a look at firejail: https://github.com/netblue30/firejail
-
Ask HN: What are some unpopular technologies you wish people knew more about?
Firejail is cool: https://github.com/netblue30/firejail
Linux namespaces/cgroups but nowhere near as heavy as Docker.
I use it when I want to limit the memory of a Python script:
```
-
Toolship: A (More) Secure Workstation
Firejail can also be a useful option, though no good if you're on Mac https://firejail.wordpress.com/
Uses the same Linux primitives as docker etc, but can be a bit more ergonomic for this use case
-
Firejail: Light, featureful and zero-dependency security sandbox for Linux
Firejail, Flatpak (which uses Bubblewrap under the hood), and Snap (which uses AppArmor) all use the same underlying technology: Linux namespaces.
This question comes up a lot, and has been answered here: https://github.com/netblue30/firejail/wiki/Frequently-Asked-...
TL;DR: Firejail has much more comprehensive features than Flatpak (Bubblewrap). Firejail also has more comprehensive network support, support for AppArmor and SELinux, and easier seccomp filtering.
Compared to Snap (which uses AppArmor), Firejail is compatible with AppArmor and again goes above and beyond with a lot of additional features.
-
Bubblewrap – Low-level unprivileged sandboxing tool used by Flatpak
Wonderful little tool, too bad you must chain various exec calling tools to get cgroups (a bit akin to `ionice ... nice ... cmd`) and Linux users namespaces can't allow UNIX sockets while preventing network access (I think?).
Migrated from Firejail when its complexity annoyed me too much and I hit https://github.com/netblue30/firejail/issues/3001 (Firejail doesn't like parens or brackets in --put/--get parameters) to a badly NIH version using bwrap and bash to have "profiles":
- Firejail: Light featureful and zero-dependency security sandbox for Linux
-
Do, or do not. There is no try
Firejail does this. The profile database is the two "profile" directories in https://github.com/netblue30/firejail/tree/master/etc
-
Strange times make for strange friends...
What do you mean by a Firefox container? Do you mean FireJail?
What are some alternatives?
easywall - Web interface for easy use of the IPTables firewall on Linux systems written in Python3.
bubblewrap - Low-level unprivileged sandboxing tool used by Flatpak and similar projects
hosts - 🔒 Consolidating and extending hosts files from several well-curated sources. Optionally pick extensions for porn, social media, and other categories.
flatpak - Linux application sandboxing and distribution framework
geoipsets - Python package to generate country-specific IP network ranges consumable by both iptables/ipset and nftables.
bubblejail - Bubblewrap based sandboxing for desktop applications
collection_nftables - Ansible modules to manage NFTables via libnftables
Flatseal - Manage Flatpak permissions
portmaster-packaging - Portmaster packages and installers
yabai - A tiling window manager for macOS based on binary space partitioning
lutris - Lutris desktop client
podman - Podman: A tool for managing OCI containers and pods.