filters VS AdGuardHome

Thanks. using bromite browser app. but none of the filters blocking ads in youtube. the default filter is https://github.com/bromite/filters/blob/master/filters.dat

https://github.com/bromite/filters/blob/master/lists.txt , where all these filters used ?

Found the list: https://github.com/bromite/filters/blob/master/lists.txt

Bromite already uses uBO's and EasyList's filters (lists used in bromite can be found here). Firefox needs uBO to be downloaded. I am not going to criticise Firefox for not having an ad-filter built-in, as it is stupid to do so. Both are good in my opinion since both browsers support custom lists, although it is a bit tedious for Bromite.

Also AdGuardhome will use optimistic caching, which is great.

https://github.com/AdguardTeam/AdGuardHome/discussions/4002#...

The main repo is GPLv3: https://github.com/AdguardTeam/AdGuardHome

They already have many other commercials products and I guess also the default filter rules are very good because of their experience in the domain.

But I think you can use it completely without the AdGuard servers and use other filter list sources.

How it compares to let's say AdGuard Home? Seems similar https://github.com/AdguardTeam/AdGuardHome

Adguardhome - Clients identification issue

You can check this documentation if you want to investigate further: https://github.com/AdguardTeam/AdGuardHome/wiki/Hosts-Blocklists

I'm using adguardhome v0.107.42 openwrt snapshot on linksys wrt1900ac v2, but when using DoH it won't resolve upstream DNS, but DoT is works perfectly OK, I've already set allow_unencrypted_doh to true in config .yaml file as per instruction here

AdGuard Home?

https://github.com/AdguardTeam/AdGuardHome

Regarding open source, AdGuard DNS actually is:

How does this compare to adguard home [ https://github.com/AdguardTeam/AdguardHome ] ??

Have you looked at AdGuard Home - Configuring clients?