ffplayout VS rtp-over-quic-draft

Compare ffplayout vs rtp-over-quic-draft and see what are their differences.

InfluxDB - Power Real-Time Data Analytics at Scale
Get real-time insights from all types of time series data with InfluxDB. Ingest, query, and analyze billions of data points in real-time with unbounded cardinality.
www.influxdata.com
featured
SaaSHub - Software Alternatives and Reviews
SaaSHub helps you find the best software and product alternatives
www.saashub.com
featured
ffplayout rtp-over-quic-draft
6 1
437 14
3.7% -
9.5 8.8
8 days ago 10 days ago
Rust Makefile
GNU General Public License v3.0 only GNU General Public License v3.0 or later
The number of mentions indicates the total number of mentions that we've tracked plus the number of user suggested alternatives.
Stars - the number of stars that a project has on GitHub. Growth - month over month growth in stars.
Activity is a relative number indicating how actively a project is being developed. Recent commits have higher weight than older ones.
For example, an activity of 9.0 indicates that a project is amongst the top 10% of the most actively developed projects that we are tracking.

ffplayout

Posts with mentions or reviews of ffplayout. We have used some of these posts to build our list of alternatives and similar projects. The last one was on 2023-05-03.

rtp-over-quic-draft

Posts with mentions or reviews of rtp-over-quic-draft. We have used some of these posts to build our list of alternatives and similar projects. The last one was on 2022-06-06.
  • Video Live Streaming: Notes on RTMP, HLS, and WebRTC
    7 projects | news.ycombinator.com | 6 Jun 2022
    I agree that RTP over QUIC [1] is closer to what we'd build today if we were starting from scratch than WebRTC is. (Partly benefiting from the lessons learned getting to WebRTC 1.0, of course.)

    It's worth noting that QUIC is also a very complex specification and is only going to get more complex as it continues through the standardization process. In parallel, there's ongoing work on the next generation of the WebRTC spec. [2] (WebRTC-NV also adds complexity. Nothing ever gets simpler.)

    My guess is that we're at least three years away from being able to use anything other than HLS and WebRTC in production. And -- pessimistically because I've worked on video for a long time and seen over and over that new stuff always take _forever_ to bake and get adoption, maybe that's going to be more like 10 years.

    [1] https://github.com/mengelbart/rtp-over-quic-draft

What are some alternatives?

When comparing ffplayout and rtp-over-quic-draft you can also consider the following projects:

FFmpeg - Mirror of https://git.ffmpeg.org/ffmpeg.git

overpass - A self-hosted live video streaming platform with Discord authentication, auto-recording and more!

IPTV-Channels - A collection of IPTV channels that can be accessed across the world!

webrtc-nuts-and-bolts - A holistic way of understanding how WebRTC and its protocols run in practice, with code and detailed documentation.

docker-wyze-bridge - WebRTC/RTSP/RTMP/LL-HLS bridge for Wyze cams in a docker container

manifesto - The Extensible Web Manifesto

folderplayout - CasparCG client for scheduled recurring playback of a playlist.

p2p-webtransport - Interface to create and manage QUIC streams

Ant-Media-Server - Ant Media Server is a live streaming engine software that provides adaptive, ultra low latency streaming by using WebRTC technology with ~0.5 seconds latency. Ant Media Server is auto-scalable and it can run on-premise or on-cloud.

FirebaseRTC - Codelab for building a WebRTC Video chat application using Firebase Cloudstore.

video-to-ascii - It is a simple python package to play videos in the terminal using characters as pixels