fdb-document-layer
litestream
fdb-document-layer | litestream | |
---|---|---|
5 | 165 | |
204 | 10,026 | |
0.0% | - | |
0.0 | 7.5 | |
almost 3 years ago | 15 days ago | |
C++ | Go | |
Apache License 2.0 | Apache License 2.0 |
Stars - the number of stars that a project has on GitHub. Growth - month over month growth in stars.
Activity is a relative number indicating how actively a project is being developed. Recent commits have higher weight than older ones.
For example, an activity of 9.0 indicates that a project is amongst the top 10% of the most actively developed projects that we are tracking.
fdb-document-layer
-
Turning SQLite into a Distributed Database
This is exactly what the engineers behind FoundationDB (FDB) wanted when they open sourced. For those who don't know, FDB provides a transactional (and distributed) ordered key-value store with a somewhat simple but very powerful API.
Their vision was to build the hardest parts of building a database, such as transactions, fault-tolerance, high-availability, elastic scaling, etc. This would free users to build higher-level APIs (Layers) APIs [1] / libraries [2] on top.
The beauty of these layers is that you can basically remove doubt about about the correctness of data once it leaves the layer. FoundationDB is one of the most (if not the) most tested databases out there. I used it for over 4 years in high write / read production environments and never once did we second guess our decision.
I could see this project renamed to simply "fdb-sqlite-layer"
[1] https://github.com/FoundationDB/fdb-document-layer
-
Cloudant/IBM back off from FoundationDB based CouchDB rewrite
https://github.com/FoundationDB/fdb-document-layer .and you get the transaction Al integrity.
I stopped using MongoDB and switched to this.
- FoundationDB Document Layer
- A truly open-source MongoDB alternative
- FoundationDB: A Distributed, Unbundled, Transactional Key Value Store [pdf]
litestream
-
Ask HN: SQLite in Production?
I have not, but I keep meaning to collate everything I've learned into a set of useful defaults just to remind myself what settings I should be enabling and why.
Regarding Litestream, I learned pretty much all I know from their documentation: https://litestream.io/
-
How (and why) to run SQLite in production
This presentation is focused on the use-case of vertically scaling a single server and driving everything through that app server, which is running SQLite embedded within your application process.
This is the sweet-spot for SQLite applications, but there have been explorations and advances to running SQLite across a network of app servers. LiteFS (https://fly.io/docs/litefs/), the sibling to Litestream for backups (https://litestream.io), is aimed at precisely this use-case. Similarly, Turso (https://turso.tech) is a new-ish managed database company for running SQLite in a more traditional client-server distribution.
-
SQLite3 Replication: A Wizard's Guide🧙🏽
This post intends to help you setup replication for SQLite using Litestream.
-
Ask HN: Time travel" into a SQLite database using the WAL files?
I've been messing around with litestream. It is so cool. And, I either found a bug in the -timestamp switch or don't understand it correctly.
What I want to do is time travel into my sqlite database. I'm trying to do some forensics on why my web service returned the wrong data during a production event. Unfortunately, after the event, someone deleted records from the database and I'm unsure what the data looked like and am having trouble recreating the production issue.
Litestream has this great switch: -timestamp. If you use it (AFAICT) you can time travel into your database and go back to the database state at that moment. However, it does not seem to work as I expect it to:
https://github.com/benbjohnson/litestream/issues/564
I have the entirety of the sqlite database from the production event as well. Is there a way I could cycle through the WAL files and restore the database to the point in time before the records I need were deleted?
Will someone take sqlite and compile it into the browser using WASM so I can drag a sqlite database and WAL files into it and then using a timeline slider see all the states of the database over time? :)
-
Ask HN: Are you using SQLite and Litestream in production?
We're using SQLite in production very heavily with millions of databases and fairly high operations throughput.
But we did run into some scariness around trying to use Litestream that put me off it for the time being. Litestream is really cool but it is also very much a cool hack and the risk of database corruption issues feels very real.
The scariness I ran into was related to this issue https://github.com/benbjohnson/litestream/issues/510
-
Pocketbase: Open-source back end in 1 file
Litestream is a library that allows you to easily create backups. You can probably just do analytic queries on the backup data and reduce load on your server.
https://litestream.io/
- Litestream – Disaster recovery and continuous replication for SQLite
- Litestream: Replicated SQLite with no main and little cost
-
Why you should probably be using SQLite
One possible strategy is to have one directory/file per customer which is one SQLite file. But then as the user logs in, you have to look up first what database they should be connected to.
OR somehow derive it from the user ID/username. Keeping all the customer databases in a single directory/disk and then constantly "lite streaming" to S3.
Because each user is isolated, they'll be writing to their own database. But migrations would be a pain. They will have to be rolled out to each database separately.
One upside is, you can give users the ability to take their data with them, any time. It is just a single file.
[0]. https://litestream.io/
-
Monitor your Websites and Apps using Uptime Kuma
Upstream Kuma uses a local SQLite database to store account data, configuration for services to monitor, notification settings, and more. To make sure that our data is available across redeploys, we will bundle Uptime Kuma with Litestream, a project that implements streaming replication for SQLite databases to a remote object storage provider. Effectively, this allows us to treat the local SQLite database as if it were securely stored in a remote database.
What are some alternatives?
mvsqlite - Distributed, MVCC SQLite that runs on FoundationDB.
rqlite - The lightweight, distributed relational database built on SQLite.
foundationdb - FoundationDB - the open source, distributed, transactional key-value store
pocketbase - Open Source realtime backend in 1 file
badger - Fast key-value DB in Go.
realtime - Broadcast, Presence, and Postgres Changes via WebSockets
wasmer-postgres - 💽🕸 Postgres library to run WebAssembly binaries.
k8s-mediaserver-operator - Repository for k8s Mediaserver Operator project
npm-registry-couchapp - couchapp bits of registry.npmjs.org
sqlcipher - SQLCipher is a standalone fork of SQLite that adds 256 bit AES encryption of database files and other security features.
mosql - MongoDB → PostgreSQL streaming replication
litefs - FUSE-based file system for replicating SQLite databases across a cluster of machines