fast-syntax-highlighting VS zsh-capture-completion

I’m concerned because I found this repo https://github.com/zdharma/fast-syntax-highlighting which tries to imitate the old repo (before it was deleted). It’s a fork from the z-shell one. I don’t know if they’re both from the sane owner but I find it sketchy. Also z-shell doesn’t have as many stars as zdharma-continuum.

It might even work with the highlighting you're already using with OMZ, but the demo uses syntax highlighting from: fast syntax highlighting

Even http://zdharma.org/ is gone

I use https://github.com/zdharma/fast-syntax-highlighting which highlights git --version differently than git --asdf. AFAIK it uses the completions to "know" what options are valid.

Syntax highlighting at https://github.com/zdharma/fast-syntax-highlighting

# Plugin: zsh-abbr # Fish like expansion of abbreviations. # https://github.com/olets/zsh-abbr . /home/tuncay/.config/zsh/zsh-abbr/zsh-abbr.zsh # Plugin: zsh-autocomplete # Realtime auto completion. # Note: Remove any calls to `compinit` from `.zshrc`. # https://github.com/marlonrichert/zsh-autocomplete . /home/tuncay/.config/zsh/zsh-autocomplete/zsh-autocomplete.plugin.zsh # Plugin: fast-syntax-highlighting # Syntax highlighting like source codes in an editor. # https://github.com/zdharma/fast-syntax-highlighting . /home/tuncay/.config/zsh/fast-syntax-highlighting/fast-syntax-highlighting.plugin.zsh

Alright. So it doesn't work for every command but for some the plugin is treating specifically. But then there is this hack https://github.com/Valodim/zsh-capture-completion which captures completion values. So maybe this could be used to generate more functions.