fast-syntax-highlighting
history-search-multi-word
Our great sponsors
| fast-syntax-highlighting | history-search-multi-word | |
|---|---|---|
| 11 | 4 | |
| 1,258 | 83 | |
| - | - | |
| 1.8 | 1.3 | |
| almost 3 years ago | about 1 year ago | |
| Shell | Shell | |
| - | GNU General Public License v3.0 or later |
Stars - the number of stars that a project has on GitHub. Growth - month over month growth in stars.
Activity is a relative number indicating how actively a project is being developed. Recent commits have higher weight than older ones.
For example, an activity of 9.0 indicates that a project is amongst the top 10% of the most actively developed projects that we are tracking.
fast-syntax-highlighting
-
Is this safe to use?
I’m concerned because I found this repo https://github.com/zdharma/fast-syntax-highlighting which tries to imitate the old repo (before it was deleted). It’s a fork from the z-shell one. I don’t know if they’re both from the sane owner but I find it sketchy. Also z-shell doesn’t have as many stars as zdharma-continuum.
-
Is there any OMZ plugin to enable inlined emacs lisp syntax highlighting?
It might even work with the highlighting you're already using with OMZ, but the demo uses syntax highlighting from: fast syntax highlighting
-
fast-syntax-highlighting VS fast-syntax-highlighting - a user suggested alternative
2 projects | 5 Jul 2022
-
https://github.com/zdharma has suddenly disappeared. I haven't found any statement from Sebastian as to why. Sebastian Gniazdowski is the author of well know projects such as `zinit` and `fast-syntax-highlighting` and regular contributor to this community. Anyone have any background about why?
Even http://zdharma.org/ is gone
- command line history
-
Is Completion-Aware Syntax Highlighting Possible?
I use https://github.com/zdharma/fast-syntax-highlighting which highlights git --version differently than git --asdf. AFAIK it uses the completions to "know" what options are valid.
-
I tried bash , zsh and fish
Syntax highlighting at https://github.com/zdharma/fast-syntax-highlighting
-
https://np.reddit.com/r/archlinux/comments/nr988v/i_feel_like_an_idiot/h19017f/
# Plugin: zsh-abbr # Fish like expansion of abbreviations. # https://github.com/olets/zsh-abbr . /home/tuncay/.config/zsh/zsh-abbr/zsh-abbr.zsh # Plugin: zsh-autocomplete # Realtime auto completion. # Note: Remove any calls to `compinit` from `.zshrc`. # https://github.com/marlonrichert/zsh-autocomplete . /home/tuncay/.config/zsh/zsh-autocomplete/zsh-autocomplete.plugin.zsh # Plugin: fast-syntax-highlighting # Syntax highlighting like source codes in an editor. # https://github.com/zdharma/fast-syntax-highlighting . /home/tuncay/.config/zsh/fast-syntax-highlighting/fast-syntax-highlighting.plugin.zsh
- I feel like an idiot.
- Newbie question // fish or zsh
history-search-multi-word
-
fish-shell: the user-friendly command-line shell
Am i the only one who feels fish is not worth it despite of hype? Don't get me wrong. I think that fish is really good shell.
BUT...
After adding the following plugins to zsh(before you chime in, it's just adding these lines,not anything configuring much. also it auto bootstraps on new install), I found out that fish is no where near configured zsh.
1) https://github.com/zdharma-continuum/zinit (plugin manager)
2) https://github.com/zdharma-continuum/fast-syntax-highlightin...
3) https://github.com/zdharma-continuum/history-search-multi-wo...
4) https://github.com/zsh-users/zsh-autosuggestions
5) https://github.com/zsh-users/zsh-completions
6) https://github.com/Aloxaf/fzf-tab
7) any good shell prompt generator like https://github.com/romkatv/powerlevel10k
For example, I use fzf integration for tab completion. Fish's fzf integration is nowhere as good as that of zsh's. Also, posix compat and almost bash compat of zsh is plus.
I acknowledge that zsh isn't perfect shell either and I have tried and failed few times in past to switch to fish. If you provide me compelling reason/s to switch to fish, I am all ears.
-
[Question] How do I make telescope fuzzy on the find_files name regardless of order
I use https://github.com/zdharma-continuum/history-search-multi-word for ZSH which has that search algorithm. Does it work with Telescope FZF native extension? I'll have to try it
-
My favorite zsh history plugin
As for history-search-multi-word, this fork is probably the most popular: https://github.com/zdharma-continuum/history-search-multi-word
-
https://github.com/zdharma has suddenly disappeared. I haven't found any statement from Sebastian as to why. Sebastian Gniazdowski is the author of well know projects such as `zinit` and `fast-syntax-highlighting` and regular contributor to this community. Anyone have any background about why?
It's already up here https://github.com/zdharma-continuum/history-search-multi-word and here https://github.com/zdharma-mirror/history-search-multi-word.
What are some alternatives?
zsh-syntax-highlighting - Fish shell like syntax highlighting for Zsh.
multi-search - Just to get it to zdharma-continuum
starship - ☄🌌️ The minimal, blazing-fast, and infinitely customizable prompt for any shell!
zinit - Flexible and fast Zsh plugin manager with clean fpath, reports, completion management, Turbo, annexes, services, packages.
zsh-autocomplete - 🤖 Real-time type-ahead completion for Zsh. Asynchronous find-as-you-type autocompletion.
zsh-completions - Additional completion definitions for Zsh.
history-search-multi-word
zimfw - Zim: Modular, customizable, and blazing fast Zsh framework
awesome-zsh-plugins - A collection of ZSH frameworks, plugins, themes and tutorials.
fast-syntax-highlighting