fast-syntax-highlightin
sheldon
fast-syntax-highlightin | sheldon | |
---|---|---|
2 | 8 | |
- | 943 | |
- | - | |
- | 6.8 | |
- | 4 months ago | |
Rust | ||
- | Apache License 2.0 |
Stars - the number of stars that a project has on GitHub. Growth - month over month growth in stars.
Activity is a relative number indicating how actively a project is being developed. Recent commits have higher weight than older ones.
For example, an activity of 9.0 indicates that a project is amongst the top 10% of the most actively developed projects that we are tracking.
fast-syntax-highlightin
-
fish-shell: the user-friendly command-line shell
Am i the only one who feels fish is not worth it despite of hype? Don't get me wrong. I think that fish is really good shell.
BUT...
After adding the following plugins to zsh(before you chime in, it's just adding these lines,not anything configuring much. also it auto bootstraps on new install), I found out that fish is no where near configured zsh.
1) https://github.com/zdharma-continuum/zinit (plugin manager)
2) https://github.com/zdharma-continuum/fast-syntax-highlightin...
3) https://github.com/zdharma-continuum/history-search-multi-wo...
4) https://github.com/zsh-users/zsh-autosuggestions
5) https://github.com/zsh-users/zsh-completions
6) https://github.com/Aloxaf/fzf-tab
7) any good shell prompt generator like https://github.com/romkatv/powerlevel10k
For example, I use fzf integration for tab completion. Fish's fzf integration is nowhere as good as that of zsh's. Also, posix compat and almost bash compat of zsh is plus.
I acknowledge that zsh isn't perfect shell either and I have tried and failed few times in past to switch to fish. If you provide me compelling reason/s to switch to fish, I am all ears.
-
Zim – The Zsh configuration framework with blazing speed and modular extensions
Is anyone else mostly rolling with the zsh (not oh-my-zsh) defaults?
After so many years of using Bash I switched to zsh almost a year ago. I use the vanilla zsh set up with 2 plugins:
- https://github.com/zdharma-continuum/fast-syntax-highlightin... for very good and fast syntax highlighting
- https://github.com/zsh-users/zsh-autosuggestions for auto-suggestions
I don't use a plugin manager, instead I put together a ~20 line shell script[0] which handles either cloning or pulling plugins, then you can load them in your zshrc[1].
I haven't found the need for anything else and my whole dev environment is based on using tmux, terminal Vim, etc.. Basically I spend a lot of time there in my day to day.
[0] https://github.com/nickjj/dotfiles/blob/0076e508403c9981e393...
[1] https://github.com/nickjj/dotfiles/blob/0076e508403c9981e393...
sheldon
-
Oh My Zsh
I prefer sheldon[1] for the few plugins I use
[1] https://github.com/rossmacarthur/sheldon
-
Zap: A minimal zsh plugin manager
Personally, I prefer https://github.com/rossmacarthur/sheldon. It's simple yet flexible, fast and shell agnostic.
- zinitからsheldonへ
-
What is the best plugin manager in your opinion?
Yes! rossmacarthur/sheldon is easy to use.
-
Zim – The Zsh configuration framework with blazing speed and modular extensions
I’ve switched away from using OMZ as an all-in-one framework that takes over my .zshrc, but I still use some of its plugins. Its plugin management is too slow for my tastes, but there’s a few plugins that I came to rely on.
Switching to Sheldon [0] has given me the best of both worlds.
[0] https://github.com/rossmacarthur/sheldon
-
zcomet - Fast, Simple Zsh Plugin Manager
I noticed that sheldon is missing from those benchmarks. Does it not qualify as a "zsh framework"?
-
Zsh Plugin managers
I’ve been using sheldon for the past few months and been pretty happy with it. It seems plenty fast enough and the most obscure the verbiage gets is the toml config file.