fast-ruby
csharplang
Our great sponsors
fast-ruby | csharplang | |
---|---|---|
4 | 262 | |
5,642 | 10,868 | |
0.2% | 1.3% | |
4.6 | 9.6 | |
5 months ago | 7 days ago | |
Ruby | C# | |
- | - |
Stars - the number of stars that a project has on GitHub. Growth - month over month growth in stars.
Activity is a relative number indicating how actively a project is being developed. Recent commits have higher weight than older ones.
For example, an activity of 9.0 indicates that a project is amongst the top 10% of the most actively developed projects that we are tracking.
fast-ruby
-
Sorry for this noobest question
In this perspective, maybe the compilation of approaches by Fast Ruby provides a similar point of entry.
-
Understading why attr_accessor in Ruby is faster than a regular method
Great article! I'm one of the maintainers of the `fast-ruby` project and I was glad to see that we have a benchmark for those idioms over here: https://github.com/fastruby/fast-ruby/blob/master/code/general/attr-accessor-vs-getter-and-setter.rb 🤓
-
Super readable String operations with `delete_prefix` and `delete_suffix`
Stylistically, chomp has a bit more of the whimsy that you might expect from Ruby, while delete_suffix is a nice mirroring of delete_prefix and more explicitly named. Both have similar performance benchmarks and are faster than sub.
-
Ruby 3.0.0 Released
If you’re interested in speed, check this repo: even among Ruby idioms there are big speed differences.
https://github.com/JuanitoFatas/fast-ruby
csharplang
- Discriminated Unions: Essa feature faz falta no CSharp
-
DevDocs
Certain parts of Microsoft Learn are permissive, for example the .NET BCL documentation is Creative Commons Attribution: https://github.com/dotnet/dotnet-api-docs as is ASP.NET Core: https://github.com/dotnet/AspNetCore.Docs (a good hint if documentation is permissively licensed and on GitHub is if there's an edit button at the top.)
The C# language specification is unfortunately a bit fuzzier: https://github.com/dotnet/csharplang/discussions/4855
The updated unified C# language specification is CC, but it's still catching up to modern C#: https://github.com/dotnet/csharpstandard
-
The golden age of Kotlin and its uncertain future
No OP, but for example you still see the C# folks still struggling to add discriminated unions to the language because of complex interactions due to its too many features[1]. Virtual threads are easier to use than async/await is another example.
[1] https://github.com/dotnet/csharplang/issues/113
-
When static types make your code shorter
For example, C# had a research fork called Spec# that had compile-time support for contracts, with keywords such as requires (for arguments) and ensures (for return values), all the way back in 2004. While still being discussed, it doesn't seem to be shipping any time soon.
-
.NET 8 – .NET Blog
Hi there. I'm the language designer who created the 'Collection Expression' design/specification: https://github.com/dotnet/csharplang/issues/5354
You can see the entire history of the proposal there. To answer you specific question, we went with `..` because that's what the language already uses for the complimentary 'pattern matching deconstruction' form for collection patterns.
In other words, you can already say this today:
if (x is [var start, .. var middle, .. var end]) { ... }
-
What's new in C# 12: overview
You must specify concrete type.
There was a plan to have "natural type" so "var list = [1,2,3]" would be of type "List" but it was postponed to C# 13 (https://github.com/dotnet/csharplang/issues/5354#issuecommen...)
-
Robust Design through Value Objects in C#
While C# currently lacks direct support for this kind of functionality, there's a glimmer of hope with an active proposal under discussion that aims to bring this feature to the language. This potential addition promises a future where C# can natively offer similar robust type narrowing.
-
The combined power of F# and C#
Given few people anticipated ValueTuple and C# adding a more direct tuple syntax, I feel like it is only a matter of time before C# adds discriminated unions.
(There are multiple proposals tracking the idea. This seems the most comprehensive and "central": https://github.com/dotnet/csharplang/issues/7016)
-
Should i quit Django and move to asp.net
I always liked list abbreviations in python, but I absolutely love Linq. I believe there is a feature proposal for C# 12, which makes collection initialization better imo.
- Can constructor parameter assignment be made less verbose?
What are some alternatives?
Rails style guide - A community-driven Ruby on Rails style guide
language-ext - C# functional language extensions - a base class library for functional programming
Ruby style guide - A community-driven Ruby coding style guide
jOOQ - jOOQ is the best way to write SQL in Java
RSpec style guide - RSpec Best Practices
SharpLab - .NET language playground
Best-Ruby - Ruby Tricks, Idiomatic Ruby, Refactoring and Best Practices
SQLDelight - SQLDelight - Generates typesafe Kotlin APIs from SQL
Fundamental Ruby - :books: Fundamental programming with ruby examples and references. It covers threads, SOLID principles, design patterns, data structures, algorithms. Books for reading. Repo for website https://github.com/khusnetdinov/betterdocs
runtimelab - This repo is for experimentation and exploring new ideas that may or may not make it into the main dotnet/runtime repo.
contracts.ruby - Contracts for Ruby.
.NET Runtime - .NET is a cross-platform runtime for cloud, mobile, desktop, and IoT apps.