fartscroll.js
purescript
| fartscroll.js | purescript | |
|---|---|---|
| 3 | 52 | |
| 2,806 | 8,464 | |
| - | 0.3% | |
| 0.0 | 6.5 | |
| over 5 years ago | 16 days ago | |
| Haskell | ||
| MIT License | BSD 3-clause "New" or "Revised" License |
Stars - the number of stars that a project has on GitHub. Growth - month over month growth in stars.
Activity is a relative number indicating how actively a project is being developed. Recent commits have higher weight than older ones.
For example, an activity of 9.0 indicates that a project is amongst the top 10% of the most actively developed projects that we are tracking.
fartscroll.js
-
TypeScript please give us types
We have types at home.
My litmus test regarding whether I can even consider using a library in production is: does it have more stars than fartscroll.js?
https://github.com/theonion/fartscroll.js/tree/master
Most of the entries there are below that number, which begs the question: is this really that much of a problem that it mandates the drastic changes required?
I actually don't know if it's even doable, considering TS's structural type system, where the answer to the question "what type is X?" is not straightforward.
-
Weekly Random Discussion Thread for 2/20/23 - 2/26/23
The best content produced by The Onion was a JavaScript library to make farting noises on scroll events: https://github.com/theonion/fartscroll.js
-
From TypeScript to ReScript
As a sort of litmus test I use the number of stars a superset of(or language compiling to) JavaScript has on GitHub and how that compares to fartscroll.js: https://github.com/theonion/fartscroll.js/
By this measure ReScript is still a niche language.
purescript
- Learning Elm by porting a medium-sized web front end from React (2019)
- Ask HN: Interest in a Rust-Inspired Language Compiling to JavaScript?
-
Building React Components Using Unions in TypeScript
Naturally I’d recommend using a better language such as ReScript or Elm or PureScript or F#‘s Fable + Elmish, but “React” is the king right now and people perceive TypeScript as “less risky” for jobs/hiring, so here we are.
-
Is there a better way to do read-only types
Unless you want to switch to https://www.purescript.org/.
-
Why I'm Leaving Elm
PureScript[1][2] seems pretty alive these days. From my relatively small, self-contained experiments, it's a lot more flexible and expressive than Elm at the expense of (maybe?) being a bit harder to learn up-front.
[1]: https://www.purescript.org/
[2]:https://github.com/purescript/purescript
- (strongly typed) functional language compilers running in browser
-
purescript VS purs-eval - a user suggested alternative
2 projects | 2 Mar 2023
- Por que Elm é uma linguagem tão deliciosa?
-
I will die on this hill (curve)
*cough* I mean Purescript.
-
My main beef with Haskell/JS
Assuming this is a PS knock, fwiw this went away a good bit ago: https://github.com/purescript/purescript/releases/tag/v0.14.2
What are some alternatives?
genType - Auto generation of idiomatic bindings between Reason and JavaScript: either vanilla or typed with TypeScript/FlowType.
fp-ts - Functional programming in TypeScript
lwt - OCaml promises and concurrent I/O
reason - Simple, fast & type safe code that leverages the JavaScript & OCaml ecosystems
melange - A mixture of tooling combined to produce JavaScript from OCaml & Reason
elm-reactor
typescript-needs-types - TypeScript please give us types.
Elm - Compiler for Elm, a functional language for reliable webapps.
rescript-compiler - The compiler for ReScript.
Idris2 - A purely functional programming language with first class types
liquidhaskell - Liquid Types For Haskell
polysemy - :gemini: higher-order, no-boilerplate monads