fartscroll.js VS typescript-needs-types

We have types at home.

My litmus test regarding whether I can even consider using a library in production is: does it have more stars than fartscroll.js?

https://github.com/theonion/fartscroll.js/tree/master

Most of the entries there are below that number, which begs the question: is this really that much of a problem that it mandates the drastic changes required?

I actually don't know if it's even doable, considering TS's structural type system, where the answer to the question "what type is X?" is not straightforward.

The best content produced by The Onion was a JavaScript library to make farting noises on scroll events: https://github.com/theonion/fartscroll.js

As a sort of litmus test I use the number of stars a superset of(or language compiling to) JavaScript has on GitHub and how that compares to fartscroll.js: https://github.com/theonion/fartscroll.js/

By this measure ReScript is still a niche language.

Welcome to the list: https://www.typescriptneedstypes.com/

Lol, look what I just found, someone created a whole petition about adding runtime type information (which would make a lot of use libraries redundant): https://www.typescriptneedstypes.com/

Author of TypeBox here. myzod looks great :) There are a surprising amount of projects emerging nowadays in this space, but I rarely get a chance to converse with other authors. I see your project is on THE LIST too https://github.com/akutruff/typescript-needs-types :)