expected-lite
expected lite - Expected objects in C++11 and later in a single-file header-only library (by martinmoene)
papers
Papers & proposals, for C++ programming language, Microsoft Windows OS, and other (by tringi)
expected-lite | papers | |
---|---|---|
3 | 4 | |
350 | 1 | |
- | - | |
5.5 | 6.8 | |
4 months ago | 4 months ago | |
C++ | ||
Boost Software License 1.0 | - |
The number of mentions indicates the total number of mentions that we've tracked plus the number of user suggested alternatives.
Stars - the number of stars that a project has on GitHub. Growth - month over month growth in stars.
Activity is a relative number indicating how actively a project is being developed. Recent commits have higher weight than older ones.
For example, an activity of 9.0 indicates that a project is amongst the top 10% of the most actively developed projects that we are tracking.
Stars - the number of stars that a project has on GitHub. Growth - month over month growth in stars.
Activity is a relative number indicating how actively a project is being developed. Recent commits have higher weight than older ones.
For example, an activity of 9.0 indicates that a project is amongst the top 10% of the most actively developed projects that we are tracking.
expected-lite
Posts with mentions or reviews of expected-lite.
We have used some of these posts to build our list of alternatives
and similar projects. The last one was on 2023-05-22.
-
Refactoring with C++17 std::optional
Or nonstd::expected. Personally, I would rather use output parameters and an enum result or a std::variant over std::optional, because at the very least you have the option for more specific error diagnostics.
-
std::expected (with monadic interface) implementation in C++20 (P0323, P2505)
As someone who is new to this API (so I can't discern from the list of features which might be better for my use case), I second the question, and I'd like to extend the question to how it compares to https://github.com/martinmoene/expected-lite and https://github.com/bitwizeshift/result as well.
-
C++ Return: std::any, std::optional, or std::variant?
More info about expected on expected-lite
papers
Posts with mentions or reviews of papers.
We have used some of these posts to build our list of alternatives
and similar projects. The last one was on 2023-05-22.
-
Announcing Windows 11 Insider Preview Build 22621.1906 and 22631.1906
I've even wrote you a short paper how to do that: https://github.com/tringi/papers/blob/main/win32-uninstall-from-start.md
-
Refactoring with C++17 std::optional
A new X64 calling convention for C++ on Windows is a decade overdue. I've been collecting a random thoughts on this [here], but it's nothing comprehensive nor ready.
-
What's that one issue with windows that to this day you haven't been able to resolve?
But the grayscale on modern composited surfaces is horrible, that I agree. I've been poking Microsoft with several different approaches on how to fix it since first preview of Windows 10 came out. But they obviously can't be bothered. They seem to be waiting until everyone owns High DPI display and the issue goes away.
-
What feature would you like to remove in C++26?
A good reason to start drafting a new x64 ABI for Windows.
What are some alternatives?
When comparing expected-lite and papers you can also consider the following projects:
span-lite - span lite - A C++20-like span for C++98, C++11 and later in a single-file header-only library
scope_guard - A modern C++ scope guard that is easy to use but hard to misuse.
Magic Enum C++ - Static reflection for enums (to string, from string, iteration) for modern C++, work with any enum type without any macro or boilerplate code
robin-hood-hashing - Fast & memory efficient hashtable based on robin hood hashing for C++11/14/17/20
expected - P0323 & P2505 std::expected simple implementation