execution-specs
mev-boost
Our great sponsors
execution-specs | mev-boost | |
---|---|---|
68 | 59 | |
772 | 1,075 | |
4.5% | 3.4% | |
9.2 | 7.9 | |
8 days ago | 10 days ago | |
Python | Go | |
Creative Commons Zero v1.0 Universal | MIT License |
Stars - the number of stars that a project has on GitHub. Growth - month over month growth in stars.
Activity is a relative number indicating how actively a project is being developed. Recent commits have higher weight than older ones.
For example, an activity of 9.0 indicates that a project is amongst the top 10% of the most actively developed projects that we are tracking.
execution-specs
-
SELFDESTRUCT: History, EIPs, Future in smart contracts
EIP6780 (SELFDESTRUCT only in same transaction) is planned for the Dencun upgrade. (See Cancun included EIPs https://github.com/ethereum/execution-specs/blob/master/network-upgrades/mainnet-upgrades/cancun.md)
-
Daily General Discussion - April 13, 2023
I followed the link which took me to https://github.com/ethereum/execution-specs/blob/master/network-upgrades/mainnet-upgrades/shanghai.md and then I started getting a little lost on the details.
- Daily General Discussion - April 12, 2023
-
The last Shanghai Fork Test date confirmed: 10:25pm UTC March 14 - Epoch 162304 on Goeril
@ TimBeiko: teams felt comfortable moving forward with Goerli, which we agreed to fork on March 14, 10:25pm UTC. I've opened a PR to update the specs accordingly: https://github.com/ethereum/execution-specs/pull/724
-
Can i get some help here regarding missed attestations Geth/Lighthouse
Mar 01 08:37:30 computername geth[402568]: INFO [03-01|08:37:30.496] - Homestead: 1150000 (https://github.com/ethereum/execution-specs/blob/master/network-upgrades/mainnet-upgrades/homestead.md)
-
We're on track, folks, March is coming!
EIP-4844 is slated for the Cancun Fork.
-
Learning about Ethereum
If you know Python you can read around the execution layer specs, namely for the EVM. Technically the "source of truth" for execution layer specs is still the yellow paper and EIPs but there's ongoing effort to turn it all into testable and executable specs. Otherwise this paper specifically goes in depth on the data structures used throughout the execution layer
-
What to Expect From Ethereum’s Next Big Upgrade
You can see them here https://github.com/ethereum/execution-specs/pull/633/files
-
Latest Week in Ethereum News
EIP-4895 for staking withdrawals is the main proposal members cared about, and it was upgraded from "EIPs Considered for Inclusion" to "Included EIPs" in the latest Shanghai specs. The other 3 are just minor changes.
-
Ethereum Core Devs Meeting confirms that all dev teams want withdrawals to be a part of Shanghai. EIP-4484 (proto-danksharding) may be moved to a separate update.
The following EIPs have now been upgraded from "EIPs Considered for Inclusion" to "Included EIPs" in the latest Shanghai specs.
mev-boost
- mevboost proposal error
-
Mevboost v1.6 - is this a bug?
FYI, this is fixed now: https://github.com/flashbots/mev-boost/issues/541
-
Daily General Discussion - June 27, 2023
mev-boost v1.6 was released yesterday - it's often the part of the validator stack that gets neglected when it comes to updates.
-
Mev and solo stacking
For the setup, did you look at https://boost.flashbots.net/ ? Pretty straightforward, and examples of configuration for validator nodes are provided for each soft (prysm, lighthouse, nimbus...). I remember using that (and potentially doing one or two little adjustments). For the explanation, flashbot doc is nice, you can start here: https://docs.flashbots.net/new-to-mev
-
Yesterday I missed my first proposal. Can anyone help explain why?
Are you also using MEV? Because a few people seem to have this same issue. Maybe it is a MEV-Geth thing. If so could you post your MEV logs?
-
Monthly Income as Eth Validatot?
Ahh I see yep, on the builder side not the validator side. Validators using https://github.com/flashbots/mev-boost but whichever builder gets chosen may likely be using those (especially if flashbots has the highest bid).
-
MEV boost Yes or No?
Personally I think the risk benefit is better to have mevboost activated. https://github.com/flashbots/mev-boost/issues/518
-
Proposal missed with error "posting the SignedBlindedBeaconBlockCapella to the builder api"
The same thing happened to me, I opened an issue in prysm and in mevboost, we are not the only ones with bad luck, https://github.com/prysmaticlabs/prysm/issues/12434 https://github.com/flashbots/mev-boost/issues/516 try adding the --build-block-parallel flag I also removed 2 relays, flashboot and brute. Hopefully next time we'll have better luck. sorry for my bad english
-
Choosing between rocketpool and solo staking. How hard is it to consistently get the expected rewards if solo staking?
MEV-Boost is an implementation of proposer-builder separation (PBS) built by Flashbots for proof of stake Ethereum. Validators running MEV-Boost maximize their staking reward by selling blockspace to an open market of builders.
- Daily General Discussion - March 21, 2023
What are some alternatives?
claimable - 🚁 Aggregates all known Ethereum airdrops and POAPs on one page
EIPs - The Ethereum Improvement Proposal repository
solidity - Solidity, the Smart Contract Programming Language
ssv - Secret-Shared-Validator(SSV) for ethereum staking
go-ethereum - Go implementation of the Ethereum protocol
blst - Multilingual BLS12-381 signature library
protocols - A zkRollup DEX & Payment Protocol
rpc-endpoint - Flashbots RPC endpoint, to be used with wallets (eg. MetaMask)
py_pairing - Elliptic curve operations, including pairings
baseline - The Baseline Protocol is an open source initiative that combines advances in cryptography, messaging, and distributed ledger technology to enable confidential and complex coordination between enterprises while keeping data in systems of record. This repo serves as the main repo for the Baseline Protocol, containing core packages, examples, and reference implementations.
eth2.0-specs - Ethereum Proof-of-Stake Consensus Specifications [Moved to: https://github.com/ethereum/consensus-specs]