epinio
pack
epinio | pack | |
---|---|---|
10 | 46 | |
500 | 2,408 | |
1.8% | 1.5% | |
8.8 | 9.4 | |
6 days ago | 7 days ago | |
Go | Go | |
Apache License 2.0 | Apache License 2.0 |
Stars - the number of stars that a project has on GitHub. Growth - month over month growth in stars.
Activity is a relative number indicating how actively a project is being developed. Recent commits have higher weight than older ones.
For example, an activity of 9.0 indicates that a project is amongst the top 10% of the most actively developed projects that we are tracking.
epinio
-
I want to be able to deploy apps as quickly as possible to on-prem k8s. I was looking at Jenkins-x with their jx create command, looks pretty powerful, but it looks complicated to setup. Any easier alternatives?
You could have a look to https://epinio.io/. It is a PAAS that leverage build pack to deploy app on k8s cluster. Disclaimer: my team is working on it
-
Questions for Heroku-like Project
Epinion
- Epinio: Kubernetes PaaS from SuSE
-
A selfhosted Heroku clone on your Kubernetes cluster
Would have helped if I spent it right đ - https://github.com/epinio/epinio
-
Epinio: the open-source Application development engine for Kubernetes
Epinio can be installed using Helm onto any compliant Kubernetes Cluster. The latest CLI release can be found at [][https://github.com/epinio/epinio/releases]
-
How to manage access to a Kubernetes cluster for Dev Teams ?
We are building a product (Epinio) to avoid this. The idea is that devs don't need to access the cluster and to know the Kubernetes internals to deploy something. It's still in alpha/beta, with a lot of development ongoing. đ
-
Moving to Kubernetes
For the Apache/php container portion and building the app itself, I'd suggest looking at buildpacks (Paketo buildpacks are easy). This can let you standardize on the code->container pipeline. (I'm biased since I'm working on Epinio which uses them to simplify the code->running application pipeline)
- Opinionated K8s platform to take you from Code to URL in one step
-
Should We Replace Docker Desktop With Rancher Desktop?
For dev work, we also are working on a project called Epinio which takes a bit of a different approach to developing on top of Kubernetes. (https://epinio.io)
-
Example of using Makefile for Kubernetes development
Your workflow describes the inner loop of development. Take a look at https://skaffold.dev that. If you canât be bothered to learn how to write k8s manifests, epinio might be worth a shot. I tried it on some simple stuff and it worked but I doubt itâs usefulness in complex setups. https://github.com/epinio/epinio
pack
- Cloud Native Buildpacks
- Différentes façons de déployer une application front faites en JS
- Recommend tooling for Docker image and .NET SBOM generation.
-
K8s powered Git push deployments
I've recently found this quote by Kelsey Hightower:
"I'm convinced the majority of people managing infrastructure just want a PaaS. The only requirement: it has to be built by them."
Source: https://twitter.com/kelseyhightower/status/85193508753294540...
In the last few weeks, I've experimented a bit with Flux (https://fluxcd.io/), Tekton (https://tekton.dev/) and Cloud Native Buildpacks (https://buildpacks.io/) on how to provide K8s powered git push deployments without using a dedicated CI/CD server.
My project is still in early alpha stage and just a proof of concept :-) My vision is to expand it into an Open Source PaaS in the future.
Do you think the above quote is true? What does an open source PaaS need to be like in order to be accepted by software developers?
Some other projects have been discontinued in the past (like Flynn or Deis) or were created before the Kubernetes era.
Is it the right direction to provide a Heroku like solution based on K8s or is it better to provide an Open Source Infrastructure as Code library with building blocks to avoid everything from scratch?
-
Where to find ARM buildpacks for Node.js?
```bash (curl -sSL "https://github.com/buildpacks/pack/releases/download/v0.28.0/pack-v0.28.0-linux-arm64.tgz" | sudo tar -C /usr/local/bin/ --no-same-owner -xzv pack)
-
Crafting container images without Dockerfiles
Although Dockerfiles have the benefit of migrating existing workloads to containers without having to update your toolchain, I definitely prefer the container-first workflow. Cloud Native [Buildpacks](https://buildpacks.io/) are a CNCF incubating project but were proven at Heroku. Buildpacks support common languages, but working on a Go project I've also had a great experience with [ko](https://ko.build/). Free yourself from Dockerfile!
-
Kubero : alternative Ă Heroku pour Kubernetes âŠ
Cloud Native Buildpacks
-
The world outside of WordPress
It's big and overwhelming and sometimes scary. But you know what? It's also fun, engaging, and very refreshing. Because I'm a DevRel, I don't have many chances to focus on something particular. Still, I'm having a lot of fun exploring different CMSs (like Statamic, Craft, or Sanity), new approaches (at last, I understood why the headless approach is so important), and diving into tech I never used before (hello Buildpacks).
- Does anyone use any alternatives to Dockerfile for creating containers? Something with nicer syntax?
- Jetstack Paranoia: A New Open-Source Tool for Container Image Security
What are some alternatives?
okteto - Develop your applications directly in your Kubernetes Cluster
kaniko - Build Container Images In Kubernetes
space-cloud - Open source Firebase + Heroku to develop, scale and secure serverless apps on Kubernetes
helm-charts - Prometheus community Helm charts
lima - Linux virtual machines, with a focus on running containers
jib - đ Build container images for your Java applications.
skaffold - Easy and Repeatable Kubernetes Development
coolify - An open-source & self-hostable Heroku / Netlify / Vercel alternative.
OpenFaaS - OpenFaaS - Serverless Functions Made Simple
kube-makefile - Makefile tooling to simplify local development for small Kubernetes projects.
kubefwd - Bulk port forwarding Kubernetes services for local development.