pack
kaniko
Our great sponsors
pack | kaniko | |
---|---|---|
46 | 49 | |
2,373 | 13,712 | |
2.0% | 1.8% | |
9.5 | 9.5 | |
1 day ago | 6 days ago | |
Go | Go | |
Apache License 2.0 | Apache License 2.0 |
Stars - the number of stars that a project has on GitHub. Growth - month over month growth in stars.
Activity is a relative number indicating how actively a project is being developed. Recent commits have higher weight than older ones.
For example, an activity of 9.0 indicates that a project is amongst the top 10% of the most actively developed projects that we are tracking.
pack
- Différentes façons de déployer une application front faites en JS
-
K8s powered Git push deployments
I've recently found this quote by Kelsey Hightower:
"I'm convinced the majority of people managing infrastructure just want a PaaS. The only requirement: it has to be built by them."
Source: https://twitter.com/kelseyhightower/status/85193508753294540...
In the last few weeks, I've experimented a bit with Flux (https://fluxcd.io/), Tekton (https://tekton.dev/) and Cloud Native Buildpacks (https://buildpacks.io/) on how to provide K8s powered git push deployments without using a dedicated CI/CD server.
My project is still in early alpha stage and just a proof of concept :-) My vision is to expand it into an Open Source PaaS in the future.
Do you think the above quote is true? What does an open source PaaS need to be like in order to be accepted by software developers?
Some other projects have been discontinued in the past (like Flynn or Deis) or were created before the Kubernetes era.
Is it the right direction to provide a Heroku like solution based on K8s or is it better to provide an Open Source Infrastructure as Code library with building blocks to avoid everything from scratch?
-
Crafting container images without Dockerfiles
Although Dockerfiles have the benefit of migrating existing workloads to containers without having to update your toolchain, I definitely prefer the container-first workflow. Cloud Native [Buildpacks](https://buildpacks.io/) are a CNCF incubating project but were proven at Heroku. Buildpacks support common languages, but working on a Go project I've also had a great experience with [ko](https://ko.build/). Free yourself from Dockerfile!
-
Kubero : alternative à Heroku pour Kubernetes …
Cloud Native Buildpacks
-
The world outside of WordPress
It's big and overwhelming and sometimes scary. But you know what? It's also fun, engaging, and very refreshing. Because I'm a DevRel, I don't have many chances to focus on something particular. Still, I'm having a lot of fun exploring different CMSs (like Statamic, Craft, or Sanity), new approaches (at last, I understood why the headless approach is so important), and diving into tech I never used before (hello Buildpacks).
- Does anyone use any alternatives to Dockerfile for creating containers? Something with nicer syntax?
- Jetstack Paranoia: A New Open-Source Tool for Container Image Security
-
YAML Buildpack: Auto Validate Configuration Repositories
[5] https://buildpacks.io/
-
Devbox 📦 : Instant, easy, and predictable shells and containers
Devbox analyzes your source code and instantly turns it into an OCI-compliant image that can be deployed to any cloud. The image is optimized for speed, size, security and caching ... and without needing to write a Dockerfile. And unlike buildpacks, it does it quickly.
-
A selfhosted Heroku clone on your Kubernetes cluster
I had a short look into buildpacks.io . So I don't have a firm opinion yet. But as much i understand now, it really builds Container images. Kubero goes a different approach. The buildstep only compiles the project to a mounted volume, which is mounted readonly to the running container. Further more is the detection step unnecessary, since the dev knows what he wants to build and selects the buildimage. How ever, I'm still looking into it, so see if my project can profit from the great work there in any other way.
kaniko
-
Building Cages - Creating better DX for deploying Dockerfiles to AWS Nitro Enclaves
Kaniko for building the container images
-
Container and image vocabulary
kaniko
-
Schedule on Least Utilized Node
If you are using the docker socket just for building container images, you might want to look into kaniko. It doesn't use docker to build images. If you use the socket also for starting containers (we are actually doing that in our CI pipelines), you could think about limiting the pods Kubernetes schedules on a node (you can change the default of 110 using the kubelet config file).
-
You should use the OpenSSF Scorecard
It took less than 5 minutes to install. It quickly analysed the repo and identified easy ways to make the project more secure. Priya Wadhwa, Kaniko
-
Faster CI builds?
As for avoiding cargo rebuilding artifacts, make sure to use the same docker image, the same target dir and same workspace dir, every build. If you're using kaniko, it also does not preserve file timestamps (#1894) causing rebuilds.
-
Ask HN: How are you dealing with the M1/ARM migration?
According to Kaniko documentation [1], they don't really support cross-platform compilation. Do you solve that by having both amd64- and arm64-based CI/CD runners?
[1] https://github.com/GoogleContainerTools/kaniko#--customplatf...
-
Interaction between Docker, AMI and Ansible
Docker is a tool for building container images and running containers. Normally you'd compose a `Dockerfile` to configure an container image, include that `Dockerfile` at the root of an application repository, then use a CI/CD system to build and deploy that image on to a fleet of servers (possibly, but not necessarily, using Ansible!). You can use Ansible to build Docker images, but the idiomatic way - e.g. the least surprising, most common way - would be to use a `Dockerfile` and `docker` itself (or another builder such as [`Buildah`](https://buildah.io/) or [`kaniko`](https://github.com/GoogleContainerTools/kaniko)).
-
Deploy Node app to GCR without Docker?
Cloud Build builds the container image on either Container Registry (older) or Artifact Registry (newer). You can specify how Artifact Registry builds this container image. It could be with a Dockerfile, or directly from source code if you tell Artifact Registry to use pack, or it could even use something called kaniko (I never used it). Instead, if you'd rather build the container image on your computer, you could use whatever tool you want, as long as it produces an OCI-compliant container image.
-
Kubernetes for Startups: Practical Considerations for Your App
Build: Workloads need to be containerized. That leads to long build times, especially if there is no caching possible/enabled for the build. A local build might be just a hot reload, but these can take many minutes with the container build step included. Please use podman, kaniko, or similar over docker for builds.
-
📺 Certified Kubernetes Administrator (CKA) training from CBT Nuggets 👨🏻💻👩🏻💻
Kaniko - build container images directly in Kubernetes clusters
What are some alternatives?
podman - Podman: A tool for managing OCI containers and pods.
buildah - A tool that facilitates building OCI images.
buildkit - concurrent, cache-efficient, and Dockerfile-agnostic builder toolkit
jib - 🏗 Build container images for your Java applications.
nerdctl - contaiNERD CTL - Docker-compatible CLI for containerd, with support for Compose, Rootless, eStargz, OCIcrypt, IPFS, ...
skopeo - Work with remote images registries - retrieving information, images, signing content
source-to-image - A tool for building artifacts from source and injecting into container images
ko - Build and deploy Go applications
docker-install - Docker installation script
podman-compose - a script to run docker-compose.yml using podman
rules_docker - Rules for building and handling Docker images with Bazel
werf - A solution for implementing efficient and consistent software delivery to Kubernetes facilitating best practices.