libc
hexchat
libc | hexchat | |
---|---|---|
2 | 22 | |
479 | 2,986 | |
1.0% | - | |
7.3 | 0.0 | |
3 months ago | 3 months ago | |
C | C | |
MIT License | GNU General Public License v3.0 only |
Stars - the number of stars that a project has on GitHub. Growth - month over month growth in stars.
Activity is a relative number indicating how actively a project is being developed. Recent commits have higher weight than older ones.
For example, an activity of 9.0 indicates that a project is amongst the top 10% of the most actively developed projects that we are tracking.
libc
-
Nolibc: A minimal C-library replacement shipped with the kernel
Seems unlikely. My spot check of the the two vfprintf implementations shows no flow from one to the other, and shows that part of the Cosmopolitan code has an older lineage than nolibc.
The nolibc source has many reference to copyright held by "Willy Tarreau", under LGPL-2.1 OR MIT license, with a copyright date starting in 2017.
The string "Tarreau" does not exist in the Cosmopolitan library, so that's a strong negative there. Let's look closer.
The file organization is quite different. And so is the implementation. So that's another negative.
Compare the vfprintf in nolibc at https://elixir.bootlin.com/linux/v6.2-rc4/source/tools/inclu... (a 'minimal vfprintf()') with the one in cosmopolitan starting at https://github.com/jart/cosmopolitan/blob/master/libc/stdio/....
Right away we can see nolibc places many functions in the same file while Cosmopolitan uses a one-function-per-filename organization.
Cosmopolitan's fvprintf locks the file (which nolibc doesn't need to do) then calls vfprintf_unlocked which calls __fmt at https://github.com/jart/cosmopolitan/blob/master/libc/fmt/fm... , which is the actual implementation. It look very different from NOLIBC's.
Okay, so perhaps that's they way now but not at the beginning?
We can also go back to Cosmopolitan's original implementation and see how vfprintf goes through https://github.com/jart/cosmopolitan/blob/c91b3c50068224929c... to call "palandprintf", which https://github.com/jart/cosmopolitan/blob/c91b3c50068224929c... says is copyright "Marco Paland" from 2014-2019.
That's a few years older than the start of nolibc, available from https://github.com/mpaland/printf , and part of https://github.com/embeddedartistry/libc , a "libc targeted for embedded systems usage".
Thus, multiple factors seem to agree that nolibc code is not used in the Cosmopolitan library.
- Any ultra portable libc?
hexchat
- mIRC i början av 2000?
-
getting started with IRC. I have some questions.
Start off using HexChat for a client. You can find channels here: https://netsplit.de/channels/
-
Problem loading simple Python script under Hexchat 2.16.1 on Windows 10
This is a bug specific to Python 2 that was already reported on Hexchat's bugtracker and there is a fix that will be part of the next release.
-
DPReview.com is shutting down
First off, grab yourself an IRC client. On their connection info page Hackint has information for both WeeChat and Hexchat, but you could use any IRC client.
-
IRC Chat?
Gajim is for XMPP. For IRC you need Hexchat or Weechat or something like that.
- HexChat won't run on new Windows 11 computer
-
TIFU by showing my dad the possibilities of the Internet.
Hexchat is one of the more popular ones.
-
Free online resources for students
IRChighway.net with hexchat.github.io
- I want to interview for private trackers, but I have no idea how to use IRC
-
Online in the 70s, 80s, and early 90s.
IRC - Also still around and in some cases, the same as it ever was, albeit with a smaller user base. A list of networks can be found here, and while there are many actively developed IRC clients out there, if you don't know where to start, most people recommend HexChat. Reddit's affiliated network is called Snoonet. mIRC is still actively developed by Khaled Mardam-Bey, so by all means, feel free to give that a shot if you are so inclined.