emacs-async
github-orgmode-tests
emacs-async | github-orgmode-tests | |
---|---|---|
24 | 245 | |
820 | 147 | |
- | - | |
6.2 | 4.8 | |
about 1 month ago | 5 months ago | |
Emacs Lisp | ||
GNU General Public License v3.0 only | - |
Stars - the number of stars that a project has on GitHub. Growth - month over month growth in stars.
Activity is a relative number indicating how actively a project is being developed. Recent commits have higher weight than older ones.
For example, an activity of 9.0 indicates that a project is amongst the top 10% of the most actively developed projects that we are tracking.
emacs-async
- emacs-async: Simple library for asynchronous processing in Emacs
-
Is there any way to run an emacs function as a separate process?
That is probably the simplest option possible; but if you need non-blocking evaluation, async package is definitely a better option.
-
Is it possible for Emacs Lisp to get something like multiprocessing from Python?
You already can. Using https://github.com/jwiegley/emacs-async or https://github.com/chuntaro/emacs-promise.
-
How to turn sequential computation into parallel computation in Elisp?
IMO the best option currently is async by Wiegley. It will manage Emacs instances for you and do all the low-level synchronization and messaging for you, so you can work in higher level abstractions as if you are working with threads.
-
Asynchronous alternative to xref?
Have you checked the async package?
-
Lsp-Bridge, Not Even Wrong
That is quite normal thing to do. Have you not seen Emacs Async? Take, a look, it is a useful thing. Or Emacs Request. Since Emacs does not have proper thread scheduler, that is the best next thing you can do.
-
[ANN] Blamer 0.6.0 released. Added pretty avatar preview
There are ways to avoid this, have you tried e.g. https://github.com/jwiegley/emacs-async ?
-
Video Series: Denote as a Zettelkasten
As a note about the third video, and searching for backlinks; the volume, when you get there, might be a slow-down when you work with many small files, like searching for backlinks. Each note means a separate file access, search process, etc. It is much more efficient for computers to read one big file, then many small files, and then just use Emacs to search in that file. If you are a developer of Denote, you might wish to look at asynchronous processes or perhaps use Wigleys Async package to search for backlinks asynchronously.
-
Setting up a fundraiser for multi-threaded Emacs, any thoughts on this?
Async process can do that. Have you checked async library by Wiegley? You can use another emacs process as a sort of clean interpreter thread similar to javascript workers.
-
My IDE is too heavy so I moved to Emacs
That "99% of standard usage" is the kicker, isn't it? Those greybeards who always opposed multithreading since long ago tend to say that the remaining 1% of use cases is best done in an external process, ideally not even written in Emacs Lisp, so that the rest of the open source community can benefit, like the GNU Global you mention. I suppose if you still want that program to be written with Emacs Lisp, you could use async.el (https://github.com/jwiegley/emacs-async/) and there's finally an use-case for the threads: it'll be relatively safe to run those 16 threads only in the external Emacs-process.
github-orgmode-tests
-
Ask HN: Has Anyone Trained a personal LLM using their personal notes?
- or to visualize and use it as a personal partner.
There's already a ton of open-source UIs such as Chatbot-ui[3] and Reor[4]. And that's just the tip of the iceberg.
Personally, I haven't been consistent enough through the years in note-taking.
So, I'm really curious to learn more about those of you who were and implemented such pipelines.
I'm sure there's a ton of really fascinating experiences.
[1] https://orgmode.org/
- Org Mode
-
From Doom to Vanilla Emacs
literate config (using ORG mode)
-
My productivity app is a never-ending .txt file
Obligatory reference to Emacs Org-Mode [1].
Author's approach is basically Org-Mode with fewer helpers.
Org-mode's power is that, at core, it's just a text file, with gradual augmentation.
Then again, Org-Mode is a tool you must install, accessible through a limited list of clients (Emacs obviously, but also VSCode), and the power of OP's approach is that it requires no external tools.
[1] https://orgmode.org
-
Show HN: Heynote – A Dedicated Scratchpad for Developers
This reminds me a lot of [Org Mode](https://orgmode.org/). Do you have plans to add other org-like features, like evaluating code blocks? I don't personally see myself moving away from org-mode, but it would be nice to have something to recommend to people who are reluctant to use emacs, even if it's only for a single application.
-
How to combine daily journal with general database of people, places, things, etc.
If you want to spare a couple of detours, you probably could start with Emacs Org-mode according to Greenspun's eleventh rule: "Any sufficiently complicated PIM or note-taking program contains an ad hoc, informally specified, bug-ridden, slow implementation of half of Org mode."
- github-orgmode-tests: This is a test project where you can explore how github interprets Org-mode files
-
Ask HN: Local Wysiwyg HTML Editor for Mac
Wow, no one has recommended Org mode (https://orgmode.org). I started using Emacs nearly 20 years ago specifically because of Org. I use Org for all my static sites, note taking, to-do lists and calendar. Org has a lightweight markup language that has far more features than Markdown (e.g., plain text spreadsheets!), but the markup isn't visible to the extent that Markdown is in most editors. Emacs with Org files behaves almost like a WYSIWYG editor. For example, links in Org files are clickable and their URLs aren't visible unless a cursor is hovered over them. I'm an obsessive note-taker with more than 6,000 Org files in my personal knowledge base and none of the dozens of other note-taking apps that I've evaluated comes even close to Emacs with Org. But to be fair, I create content on Linux only so support for mobile devices doesn't matter to me.
By the way, I think it's hilarious that you mentioned Dreamweaver, dv35z, because I experimented with using Dreamweaver for note-taking in the 90s! I still have a few HTML files that include notes I took back then using Dreamweaver. Needless to say, I definitely prefer Emacs with Org!
-
Think in Analog, Capture in Digital
Just another reason for one to get into org-mode[1] and org-roam[2].
Combine this with the concept of Zettelkasten[3] and you have a wonderful way to organize and store all your notes and writings, and even a way to know at what point you should move your idea from analog to digital (based on it's maturity, e.g. "evergreen state").
1. https://orgmode.org/
- Welche Note taking/Wiki App nutzt ihr, falls überhaupt?
What are some alternatives?
ranger.el - Bringing the goodness of ranger to dired!
logseq - A local-first, non-linear, outliner notebook for organizing and sharing your personal knowledge base. Use it to organize your todo list, to write your journals, or to record your unique life.
Taskflow - A General-purpose Parallel and Heterogeneous Task Programming System
org-roam-ui - A graphical frontend for exploring your org-roam Zettelkasten
esxml - An elisp library for working with xml, esxml and sxml.
todo.txt-cli - ☑️ A simple and extensible shell script for managing your todo.txt file.
Thrust - [ARCHIVED] The C++ parallel algorithms library. See https://github.com/NVIDIA/cccl
marktext - 📝A simple and elegant markdown editor, available for Linux, macOS and Windows.
org-yaap
Joplin - Joplin - the secure note taking and to-do app with synchronisation capabilities for Windows, macOS, Linux, Android and iOS.
oneTBB - oneAPI Threading Building Blocks (oneTBB)
pandoc - Universal markup converter