elasticsearch-py
bleve
elasticsearch-py | bleve | |
---|---|---|
21 | 13 | |
4,147 | 9,701 | |
0.5% | 1.0% | |
8.9 | 8.0 | |
3 days ago | 4 days ago | |
Python | Go | |
Apache License 2.0 | Apache License 2.0 |
Stars - the number of stars that a project has on GitHub. Growth - month over month growth in stars.
Activity is a relative number indicating how actively a project is being developed. Recent commits have higher weight than older ones.
For example, an activity of 9.0 indicates that a project is amongst the top 10% of the most actively developed projects that we are tracking.
elasticsearch-py
- Verify Connection to Elasticsearch (2021)
- An alternative to Elasticsearch that runs on a few MBs of RAM
- Help With Psort.py -> ELK
- Elastic Open Sources Their Endpoint Security Protection YARA Ruleset
-
OpenSearch β open-source search and analytics based on Apache 2.0 Elasticsearch
FD: I have a friend who works at Elastic, though he doesn't really colour my opinions of things.
> Firstly, dick moves like this: https://github.com/elastic/elasticsearch-py/pull/1623
I understand that this is unpopular, but you can make a very strong argument that it's to prevent weird errors in the future. I'm also guilty of littering my code with Asserts to ensure the universe is working fine.
The alternative is to allow it to work and then you end up with weird issues like when you connect mysql client to mariadb server (and vice-versa): https://stackoverflow.com/questions/50169576/mysql-8-0-11-er...
> Secondly, I don't buy the argument from Elastic any more. Yes, the ethical thing to do when you're making money from someone's work is at least contribute back. At the same time though, they're making money from packaging it up and selling it _as a service_. That "as a service" part is where they're making the bucks.
That's just an opinion, yes they have a service, and yes it competes with Amazon. Is it cool for Amazon to take a body of work and sell it without supporting it? Are amazon actually supporting it? Is it the same as Elastic using Lucene? (not really because Elastic submits a the majority of fixes to Lucene, but, you get it).
it's kinda gray, I'm sure Amazon thinks they're the good guy, but it's hard for me to look at Elastic as the bad guy in all this.
- Struggling reading code with type hints
-
I Don't Think Elasticsearch Is a Good Logging System
Oh man, https://github.com/elastic/elasticsearch-py/issues/1734 is a disappointing read. I know ES wants to save their business, but alienating users isn't exactly the path to success.
- Elasticsearch adding code to reject connections to OpenSearch clusters or to clusters running open source distributions of ES7
- Official Elasticsearch Python library no longer works with open-source forks
bleve
-
Hermes v1.7
I don't have the answer to that, but the project has been alive for many years. Seems maybe you should find the answer since you are developing a competing solution? Also it might be a good reference project for solving similar problems to yours. They do have bench tests you could play with https://github.com/blevesearch/bleve/blob/master/query_bench_test.go
-
Seeking a free full text search solution for large data with progress display
I know of https://github.com/blevesearch/bleve and I think there was another project for full text search that I can't find now.
- Any Full Text Search library for json data?
-
An alternative to Elasticsearch that runs on a few MBs of RAM
I would be interested in such a testbed. I would also like to know how Bleve Search (https://github.com/blevesearch/bleve) turns out.
I have for many years now a small search engine project in my free-time pipeline, but I'm before crawling even and I intend to sit for searching part after some of that.
- What is the coolest Go open source projects you have seen?
-
BetterCache 2.0 (has full text search/remove, etc.)
Haha. Seriously I canβt tell the difference between these libraries https://github.com/blevesearch/bleve
-
I want to dive into how to make search engines
I've never worked on a project that encompasses as many computer science algorithms as a search engine. There are a lot of topics you can lookup in "Information Storage and Retrieval":
- Tries (patricia, radix, etc...)
- Trees (b-trees, b+trees, merkle trees, log-structured merge-tree, etc..)
- Consensus (raft, paxos, etc..)
- Block storage (disk block size optimizations, mmap files, delta storage, etc..)
- Probabilistic filters (hyperloloog, bloom filters, etc...)
- Binary Search (sstables, sorted inverted indexes, roaring bitmaps)
- Ranking (pagerank, tf/idf, bm25, etc...)
- NLP (stemming, POS tagging, subject identification, sentiment analysis etc...)
- HTML (document parsing/lexing)
- Images (exif extraction, removal, resizing / proxying, etc...)
- Queues (SQS, NATS, Apollo, etc...)
- Clustering (k-means, density, hierarchical, gaussian distributions, etc...)
- Rate limiting (leaky bucket, windowed, etc...)
- Compression
- Applied linear algebra
- Text processing (unicode-normalization, slugify, sanitation, lossless and lossy hashing like metaphone and document fingerprinting)
- etc...
I'm sure there is plenty more I've missed. There are lots of generic structures involved like hashes, linked-lists, skip-lists, heaps and priority queues and this is just to get 2000's level basic tech.
- https://github.com/quickwit-oss/tantivy
- https://github.com/valeriansaliou/sonic
- https://github.com/mosuka/phalanx
- https://github.com/meilisearch/MeiliSearch
- https://github.com/blevesearch/bleve
- https://github.com/thomasjungblut/go-sstables
A lot of people new to this space mistakenly think you can just throw elastic search or postgres fulltext search in front of terabytes of records and have something decent. The problem is that search with good rankings often requires custom storage so calculations can be sharded among multiple nodes and you can do layered ranking without passing huge blobs of results between systems.
-
Why Writing Your Own Search Engine Is Hard (2004)
For those curious, I'm on my 3rd search engine as I keep discovering new methods of compactly and efficiently processing and querying results.
There isn't a one-size-fits all approach, but I've never worked on a project that encompasses as many computer science algorithms as a search engine.
- Tries (patricia, radix, etc...)
- Trees (b-trees, b+trees, merkle trees, log-structured merge-tree, etc..)
- Consensus (raft, paxos, etc..)
- Block storage (disk block size optimizations, mmap files, delta storage, etc..)
- Probabilistic filters (hyperloloog, bloom filters, etc...)
- Binary Search (sstables, sorted inverted indexes)
- Ranking (pagerank, tf/idf, bm25, etc...)
- NLP (stemming, POS tagging, subject identification, etc...)
- HTML (document parsing/lexing)
- Images (exif extraction, removal, resizing / proxying, etc...)
- Queues (SQS, NATS, Apollo, etc...)
- Clustering (k-means, density, hierarchical, gaussian distributions, etc...)
- Rate limiting (leaky bucket, windowed, etc...)
- text processing (unicode-normalization, slugify, sanitation, lossless and lossy hashing like metaphone and document fingerprinting)
- etc...
I'm sure there is plenty more I've missed. There are lots of generic structures involved like hashes, linked-lists, skip-lists, heaps and priority queues and this is just to get 2000's level basic tech.
- https://github.com/quickwit-oss/tantivy
- https://github.com/valeriansaliou/sonic
- https://github.com/mosuka/phalanx
- https://github.com/meilisearch/MeiliSearch
- https://github.com/blevesearch/bleve
A lot of people new to this space mistakenly think you can just throw elastic search or postgres fulltext search in front of terabytes of records and have something decent. That might work for something small like a curated collection of a few hundred sites.
-
Mattermost β open-source platform for secure collaboration
Search in SQL databases is a tough beast to get it right. And given that we support MySQL and Postgres both, it gets even harder to support quirks of both of them.
In enterprise editions, the only addition is Elasticsearch. But in our open-source version, we do have support for https://github.com/blevesearch/bleve. Although, it's in beta, we have a lot of customers using it.
I am wondering if you have tried using it and didn't like it?
- A Database for 2022
What are some alternatives?
searxng - SearXNG is a free internet metasearch engine which aggregates results from various search services and databases. Users are neither tracked nor profiled.
Elasticsearch - Free and Open, Distributed, RESTful Search Engine
quickwit - Cloud-native search engine for observability. An open-source alternative to Datadog, Elasticsearch, Loki, and Tempo.
elastic - Deprecated: Use the official Elasticsearch client for Go at https://github.com/elastic/go-elasticsearch
helm-charts
goriak - goriak - Go language driver for Riak KV
orama - π Fast, dependency-free, full-text and vector search engine with typo tolerance, filters, facets, stemming, and more. Works with any JavaScript runtime, browser, server, service!
elasticsql - convert sql to elasticsearch DSL in golang(go)
qryn - qryn is a polyglot, high-performance observability framework for ClickHouse. Ingest, store and analyze logs, metrics and telemetry traces from any agent supporting Loki, Prometheus, OTLP, Tempo, Elastic, InfluxDB and many more formats and query transparently using Grafana or any other compatible client.
goes
evtx2es - A library for fast parse & import of Windows Eventlogs into Elasticsearch.
elastigo - A Go (golang) based Elasticsearch client library.