eioio
semgrep
eioio | semgrep | |
---|---|---|
25 | 75 | |
517 | 9,742 | |
2.3% | 1.4% | |
9.0 | 9.9 | |
8 days ago | 1 day ago | |
OCaml | OCaml | |
GNU General Public License v3.0 or later | GNU Lesser General Public License v3.0 only |
Stars - the number of stars that a project has on GitHub. Growth - month over month growth in stars.
Activity is a relative number indicating how actively a project is being developed. Recent commits have higher weight than older ones.
For example, an activity of 9.0 indicates that a project is amongst the top 10% of the most actively developed projects that we are tracking.
eioio
-
Eio 1.0 Release: Introducing a new Effects-Based I/O Library for OCaml
the actual project (Readme has some code samples): https://github.com/ocaml-multicore/eio
-
OCaml: a Rust developer's first impressions
For 5.0+ you might want to look at https://github.com/ocaml-multicore/eio for how effects can make async much more pleasant
- Alternatives to scala FP
-
How Much Memory Do You Need to Run 1 Million Concurrent Tasks?
Great post! I would love to see this extended to OCaml 5 (with eio) and Haskell
- Eio -- Effects-Based Parallel IO for OCaml
-
OCaml 5.0.0: multicore support and effect handlers for OCaml
Second, effects enable a new style of concurrency libraries like eio that forgoes the need to wrap every asynchronous computation in a monad.
- OCaml 5.0 Multicore is out
-
What’s so great about functional programming anyway?
> This is realllly unidiomatic in real world Haskell.
Whether idiomatic or not does not matter. It proves my point:
IO won't save you, and even very mundane effects are not part of the game…
Idris is the "better Haskell" sure, but the effect tracking is still part of the uncanny valley (still IO monad based).
Koka is a toy, and Frank mostly "only a paper" (even there is some code out there).
The "Frank concept" is to some degree implemented in the Unison language, though:
https://www.unison-lang.org/learn/fundamentals/abilities/
Having a notion of co-effects (or however you please to call them) is imho actually much more important than talking about effects (as effects are in fact neither values nor types—something that all the IO kludges get wrong).
I think the first practicable approach in the mainstream about this topic will be what gets researched and developed for Scala. The main take away is that you need to look at things form the co-effects side first and foremost!
In case anybody is interested in what happens in Scala land in this regard:
https://www.slideshare.net/slideshow/embed_code/key/aLE9M37d...
https://docs.scala-lang.org/scala3/reference/experimental/cc...
But also the development in OCaml seems interesting:
https://github.com/ocaml-multicore/eio#design-note-capabilit...
Look mom, "effects", but without the monad headache!
-
Practical OCaml, Multicore Edition
To enable access to all these features, an exciting new library called Eio is being developed. It uses a new paradigm of direct-style concurrent I/O programming, without the need for monads or async/await, thus avoiding the function colour problem.
semgrep
- Semgrep: Semantic Grep for Code
-
A Deep Dive Into Terraform Static Code Analysis Tools: Features and Comparisons
Semgrep OSS Owner/Maintainer: Semgrep Age: First release on GitHub on February 6th, 2020 License: GNU Lesser General Public License v2.1
- Semgrep – Find bugs and enforce code standards
-
Application Security - Bridging Frontend and Cybersecurity: What is Application Security?
Semgrep - https://semgrep.dev
-
Creating a DevSecOps pipeline with Jenkins — Part 1
For the SAST stage, I used SonarQube tool. SonarQube is an open-source platform developed by SonarSource for continuous inspection of code quality to perform automatic reviews with static analysis of code to detect bugs and code smells on more than 30 programming languages. I preferred SonarQube instead of other SAST tools because it has a detailed documentation and plugins about integration with Jenkins and SonarQube works with Java projects pretty well. Of course you can similar multi-language-supported tools such as Semgrep or language-specific tools such as Bandit.
-
Tree-Sitter
> Not sure I understand your point.
The problem is using Treesitter (for syntax highlighting and "semantic movements") and an LSP at the same time. So if your language has a LSP, using Treesitter additionally is redundant at best and introduces inconcistency at worst.
I'm not talking about using Treesitter as the parser for the LSP.
> Most popular languages have language-specific tools
I'd say even less popular langauges like Coq^H^H^HRocq, Lean 4, Koka, Idris, Unison, ... have their "own" tools, I do not know of a language that uses a Treesitter parser in its LSP, but I do know about tools like https://semgrep.dev/ (written in OCaml) and Github's code search which use Treesitter.
-
AST-grep(sg) is a CLI tool for code structural search, lint, and rewriting
Well, when I seach for "semgrep", I get a very nice corporate landing page with a "Book Demo" button. Which is a level of hassle that just isn't worth it for smaller teams, because "Book Demo" usually means "We're going to try to do a dance to see how much money we can extract from you." Which smaller teams may only want to do for a handful of key tools.
(4 years ago, I was more willing to put up with enterprise licensing. But in the last two years, I've seen way too many enterprise vendors try to squeeze every penny they can get from existing clients. An enterprise sales process now often means "Expect 30% annual price hikes once you're in too deep to back out.")
There's also an open source "semgrep" project here: https://github.com/semgrep/semgrep. But this seems to be basically a vulernability scanner, going by the README.
Whereas AST-grep seems to focus heavily on things like:
1. One-off searching: "Search my tree for this pattern."
2. Refactoring: "Replace this pattern with this other pattern."
AST-grep also includes a vulnerability scanning mode like semgrep.
It's possible that semgrep also has nice support for (1) and (2), but it isn't clearly visible on their corporate landing page or the first open source README I found.
-
Top 10 Snyk Alternatives for Code Security
7. Semgrep
-
semgrep VS bearer - a user suggested alternative
2 projects | 10 Jul 2023
What are some alternatives?
ocaml-multicore - Multicore OCaml
SonarQube - Continuous Inspection
roast - 🦋 Raku test suite
snyk - Snyk CLI scans and monitors your projects for security vulnerabilities. [Moved to: https://github.com/snyk/cli]
loom - Concurrency permutation testing tool for Rust.
codeql - CodeQL: the libraries and queries that power security researchers around the world, as well as code scanning in GitHub Advanced Security
domainslib - Parallel Programming over Domains
Spotbugs - SpotBugs is FindBugs' successor. A tool for static analysis to look for bugs in Java code.
rescript-compiler - The compiler for ReScript.
pre-commit - A framework for managing and maintaining multi-language pre-commit hooks.
effects-examples - Examples to illustrate the use of algebraic effects in Multicore OCaml
detect-secrets - An enterprise friendly way of detecting and preventing secrets in code.