echopraxia-plusscala VS logstash-logback-encoder

So I hope the simplest way to do this is echopraxia-plusscala. (ObDisclaimer, I am author.)

I've been working on https://github.com/tersesystems/echopraxia-plusscala to make logging easier, let me know what you think.

I use the logstash json format.

We're using https://github.com/logfellow/logstash-logback-encoder with logback (on Play Framework, but should work fine on Lambda as well).

For those interested in the details, I've created an example implementation based on Spring-flavoured REST and Logbook+logstash-logback-encoder within my own json-log-filter project for PoC / reference.

what's the difference to https://github.com/logfellow/logstash-logback-encoder ??

Don't use filebeat. Filebeat is for systems that you cannot change logging for. Push logs directly to logstash via logstash appender. Since I'm mainly logback user, there's one directly by logstash at https://github.com/logstash/logstash-logback-encoder. Quick search indicates that there's https://github.com/viskan/logstash-appender/ for log4j also and it seems it also supports MDC abuse as indicated by https://github.com/viskan/logstash-appender/blob/master/src/main/java/com/viskan/log4j/logstash/appender/LogstashAppender.java#L256. By abusing the MDC you won't need to write a processing pattern in logstash to extract metadata from giant blob line as each key in MDC will get assigned additional value, making your records in elastic search more useful.

You can use the Logstash Logback encooder. You mentioned Elk, so there must be a Logstash running somewhere you can connect to with this appender

We need to add traceId and spanId values to the application log. In production we would use the logstash-logback-encoder to generate logs in JSON format and send them to an ELK but for the demo we use this plain text logback layout: