pash VS lf

Thank you ! That's extremely helpful. I am using pash but it sounds potentially compatiable with "pass".

The core of my solution is a simple Password Manager called pash.

I prefer pash, but same diff

> It’s secure, because it’s a short bash script

There is also POSIX sh implementation available that is even shorter: https://github.com/dylanaraps/pash

And, of course, pash, a password manager written in 145 SLOC of POSIX shell. A more minimal alternative to pass (passwordstore). It can also use tr to filter a given charset from /dev/urandom to generate passwords.

A very good alternative to ranger is lf https://github.com/gokcehan/lf

It's a lot faster in all aspects, has mostly the same features and is pretty much a standalone binary.

I've tried using LF in the past, but it didn't stick. Will definitely give this a go, as I'm trying to move to an pure terminal workflow as closely as possible.

https://github.com/gokcehan/lf

Hi. fff, lf, clifm Won't say they're best or not, rather interesting and maybe worth looking at. Looked up for the z in termux's repos and it's called "zoxide" there.

in the Github page for lf under etc, you can find instruction for making such a function for bash and fish.

I recently discovered an amazing terminal file manager (lf). The package is available for most mainstream distros but not for openSUSE.

For me, the main program missing is "lf" the ranger inspired terminal file manager. 5000 stars on Github, packaged in the official repos for basically anything under the sun except Fedora and a key part in my day-to-day workflow. https://github.com/gokcehan/lf