dunk VS DeepFaceLive

Here’s another one. Output is a little more colorful and resembles GitHub.

https://github.com/darrenburns/dunk

dunk - You can use this to get prettier git diffs.

dunk – Prettier git diffs

# Dunk - prettier git diffs # https://github.com/darrenburns/dunk - name: check is dunk installed shell: command -v black register: dunk_exists ignore_errors: yes - name: install dunk when: dunk_exists is failed shell: pipx install dunk

https://github.com/iperov/DeepFaceLive. This is the first result Google gives me. Rudimentary, but enough to possibly trick someone who isn't knowledgeable enough. Instead of a fully AI generated person, it is a digital face swap. Essentially, you are correct in that the technological leap towards making a fully interactive deep fake is likely far beyond current technological capabilities. Especially for a scammer. Digitally swapping a face sidesteps that technological limitation.

A more lifelike deformer would be running a 'deepfake' layer over your face motion into your 2D character face, but so far I haven't tried it yet. Here is some example of a well known open source 'faceswapper' : https://github.com/iperov/DeepFaceLive

DeepFaceLive https://github.com/iperov/DeepFaceLive You have to create a celeb model first or download a publicly available model

"Advanced AI" is an expression that makes politicians and decision makers to go on a rampage. Don't get your hopes up, the way the world reacted to ChatGPT, Stable Diffusion and stuff like that already suggests all AIs will be pretty much government regulated eventually and people like Eugenia has no way to circumvent this. Add projects like https://github.com/iperov/DeepFaceLive into the mix and you can see the perfect storm brewing up already...