duct.rs VS tonic

There is also duct which is not so much geared towards writing an interpreter, but does provide simplified macros for running subprocesses.

This doesn't address the generate-and-build step, but you can probably accomplish that by shelling out (perhaps with duct) to cargo build assuming your runtime environment has the necessary tools installed.

As mentioned by /u/llogiq, std::process::Command will work if you mean shelling out to another binary, but I wanted to point out the crate duct which makes this kind of thing simpler to handle.

Use tonic-build directly from Rust.

} // Omit the remaining code and refer to the example in Tonic: https://github.com/hyperium/tonic/blob/master/examples/src/multiplex/server.rs ```

If I’m not misunderstanding, you could both decode the gRPC protobuf AND write to delta lake in Rust. Tonic, Delta-rs.

Original post: https://github.com/hyperium/tonic/issues/1405. Cross-post here in case the problem is not specific to tonic.

Tonic

Just to double check Is this the correct repo?

Wasm isn't involved much actually. Basically, the frontend asks the backend to perform a gRPC call on its behalf using Tauri events. They are like named channels on which you can send any serde-compatible value. But the backend is a normal Rust program so there are no constraints there. I use prost-reflect to encode/decode Protobuf messages according to Protobuf descriptors loaded at runtime and make the actual requests using tonic from the tokio ecosystem. prost-reflect is necessary because, normally, tonic expects the Protobuf descriptor to be known at compile time so it can make some code generation behind the scenes.

You could have a look at gRPC i.e. https://github.com/hyperium/tonic

Looking at this example code: https://github.com/hyperium/tonic/blob/master/examples/src/tower/server.rs

The remaining gap is remote actors, since you still need some kind of serialization between them, and take your pick of standards for that one such as gRPC using Tonic.