dtoa-benchmark
C++ double-to-string conversion benchmark (by tearosccebe)
nanobench
Simple, fast, accurate single-header microbenchmarking functionality for C++11/14/17/20 (by martinus)
Our great sponsors
| dtoa-benchmark | nanobench | |
|---|---|---|
| 5 | 13 | |
| 0 | 1,307 | |
| - | - | |
| 6.7 | 5.0 | |
| about 2 years ago | 8 months ago | |
| C++ | C++ | |
| MIT License | MIT License |
The number of mentions indicates the total number of mentions that we've tracked plus the number of user suggested alternatives.
Stars - the number of stars that a project has on GitHub. Growth - month over month growth in stars.
Activity is a relative number indicating how actively a project is being developed. Recent commits have higher weight than older ones.
For example, an activity of 9.0 indicates that a project is amongst the top 10% of the most actively developed projects that we are tracking.
Stars - the number of stars that a project has on GitHub. Growth - month over month growth in stars.
Activity is a relative number indicating how actively a project is being developed. Recent commits have higher weight than older ones.
For example, an activity of 9.0 indicates that a project is amongst the top 10% of the most actively developed projects that we are tracking.
dtoa-benchmark
Posts with mentions or reviews of dtoa-benchmark.
We have used some of these posts to build our list of alternatives
and similar projects. The last one was on 2022-02-07.
-
Why Windows isn't ready for Arm developers
About floating point benchmark it was actually faster than dragonbox. Dragonbox has added improvements based on the optimzation provided by fast_io. Do not what is the situation right now. https://github.com/tearosccebe/dtoa-benchmark
- fast_io outperforms Dragonbox source for 7% on floating-point formatting algorithms by avoiding C++ abstractions. There are no zero-cost abstractions.
- C++20 std::format is already std::regex 2.0 situation.
- C++20 std::format is 2x slower than std::fstream?
nanobench
Posts with mentions or reviews of nanobench.
We have used some of these posts to build our list of alternatives
and similar projects. The last one was on 2023-05-27.
-
The issue of unit tests and performance measurements (Benchmark)
An alternative is tracking the number of instructions a test executes: https://github.com/martinus/nanobench
-
how do you properly benchmark?
Nano bench is a great library with low overhead. https://github.com/martinus/nanobench
-
Much Faster than std::string, fmt::format, std::to_chars, std::time and more?
I've done a relatively simple test of taking random doubles (between 0 and 1), converting them to a C string via std::to_chars and then converting that C string back to a double via std::from_chars vs his xeerx::chars_to and got the following results on my machine via nanobench:
-
Can you give an example of well-designed C++ code, and explain why you think it is so?
I like https://nanobench.ankerl.com/
-
Best accurate way to measure/compare elapsed time in C++
Of course, the best way to benchmark is nanobench: https://nanobench.ankerl.com/
-
The 23 year-old C++ developers with three job offers over $500k
I've created robin-hood-hashing and nanobench, and recently made some contributions to Bitcoin and doxygen
-
I don’t know which container to use (and at this point I’m too afraid to ask)
Right. Regex runtime construction is known to be slow, so ideally the state machinery construction is built at compile time (boost.xpressive, ctre). Also, boost.regex is faster than most of the std implementations if compile time isn’t possible. And if that’s no good rewrite without regex. Since it sounds like it’s all encapsulated at least it would be easy to measure the options. These days I use this one to compare https://nanobench.ankerl.com/
-
I'm writing a microbenchmarking library called "precision" without any macros. What do you guys think of the API?
You can check the API of nanobench which also doesn't use macros, as far as I have used it.
-
C++20 std::format is 2x slower than std::fstream?
I've tried again with your latest changes and decided to use https://github.com/martinus/nanobench for a better benchmark and got the following output:
- Nanobench: Fast, Accurate, Single-Header Microbenchmarking Functionality For C++
What are some alternatives?
When comparing dtoa-benchmark and nanobench you can also consider the following projects:
dragonbox - Reference implementation of Dragonbox in C++
benchmark - A microbenchmark support library
fast_io - C++20 Concepts IO library which is 10x faster than stdio and iostream
C++ Format - A modern formatting library
robin-hood-hashing - Fast & memory efficient hashtable based on robin hood hashing for C++11/14/17/20
curl4cpp - Single header cURL wrapper for C++ around libcURL
ut - C++20 μ(micro)/Unit Testing Framework
bench-rest - bench-rest - benchmark REST (HTTP/HTTPS) API's. node.js client module for easy load testing / benchmarking REST API's using a simple structure/DSL can create REST flows with setup and teardown and returns (measured) metrics.
Kalman - Kalman Filter
microservices-framework-benchmark - Raw benchmarks on throughput, latency and transfer of Hello World on popular microservices frameworks
cmake-init - The missing CMake project initializer
dtoa-benchmark vs dragonbox
nanobench vs benchmark
dtoa-benchmark vs fast_io
nanobench vs fast_io
dtoa-benchmark vs C++ Format
nanobench vs robin-hood-hashing
nanobench vs curl4cpp
nanobench vs ut
nanobench vs bench-rest
nanobench vs Kalman
nanobench vs microservices-framework-benchmark
nanobench vs cmake-init