gitian.sigs VS gitian-builder

Compare gitian.sigs vs gitian-builder and see what are their differences.

gitian.sigs

Trusted Build Process signatures (by dogecoin)

gitian-builder

Build packages in a secure deterministic fashion inside a VM (by devrandom)
Our great sponsors
  • InfluxDB - Power Real-Time Data Analytics at Scale
  • WorkOS - The modern identity platform for B2B SaaS
  • SaaSHub - Software Alternatives and Reviews
gitian.sigs gitian-builder
6 7
9 397
- -
4.6 0.0
about 1 month ago almost 2 years ago
Python
- GNU General Public License v3.0 or later
The number of mentions indicates the total number of mentions that we've tracked plus the number of user suggested alternatives.
Stars - the number of stars that a project has on GitHub. Growth - month over month growth in stars.
Activity is a relative number indicating how actively a project is being developed. Recent commits have higher weight than older ones.
For example, an activity of 9.0 indicates that a project is amongst the top 10% of the most actively developed projects that we are tracking.

gitian.sigs

Posts with mentions or reviews of gitian.sigs. We have used some of these posts to build our list of alternatives and similar projects. The last one was on 2021-05-11.
  • Dogecoin Core flagged as malware?
    2 projects | /r/dogecoin | 11 May 2021
    Dogecoin core uses gitian technique to verify binaries. Do a SHA256SUM of the downloaded installation file and compare that value with the one in the gitian assert file (for example I think this is the assert file for 1.14.3 mac os) for the version you downloaded. If they match you have nothing to worry about, MacOs is probably written to yell at legitimate dogecoin-core.
  • How to verify Dogecoin Core binary releases
    3 projects | /r/dogecoindev | 29 Apr 2021
    git clone https://github.com/devrandom/gitian-builder git clone https://github.com/dogecoin/dogecoin git clone https://github.com/dogecoin/gitian.sigs pushd dogecoin git checkout v1.14.3 popd
  • Dogecoin Core 1.14.3
    2 projects | /r/dogecoindev | 28 Feb 2021
    The installers (and zipfiles, dmgs and tarballs) are signed with all our pgp keys, you can compare the hashes for windows binaries here https://github.com/dogecoin/gitian.sigs/tree/master/1.14.3-win (against our validated pgp keys)
  • Dogecoin Core checksums
    1 project | /r/dogecoin | 10 Feb 2021
  • Is there any GPG signatures or at least SH256 checksums to verify my Dogecoin Core?
    3 projects | /r/dogecoindev | 8 Feb 2021
    If you just want to check if your binary is the signed one, and you're on, say windows 64-bit, you take one of the signer's lists that were published and dig out the sha256, eg: https://github.com/dogecoin/gitian.sigs/blob/master/1.14.2-win/langerhans/dogecoin-win-1.14-build.assert#L8

gitian-builder

Posts with mentions or reviews of gitian-builder. We have used some of these posts to build our list of alternatives and similar projects. The last one was on 2022-05-14.
  • Development roundup for Dogecoin Core - May 14th, 2022
    7 projects | /r/dogecoindev | 14 May 2022
    A number of pull requests are still awaiting gitian checks. Unfortunately, my attempt to review and help pulling #2579 (that would make it much easier to do gitian checks) over the finish line, is not ready because the gitian-builder software that we need for this has a bug. I have opened a pull request with them to fix the issue but because Bitcoin Core is moving away from this software, it takes a little longer to get things merged there. If I see no progress on this until Friday the 20th, I will propose to temporarily fix it locally in our own scripts.
  • Open Source Maintainer Sabotages Code to Wipe Russian, Belarusian Computers
    16 projects | /r/worldnews | 18 Mar 2022
  • Introduction to my PoW based Cryptocurrency
    2 projects | dev.to | 19 Feb 2022
    So I also faced errors even after finding these bad boys. I kept getting a system error but I solved that using help from stack overflow and some Linux forums. Bitcoin.org too was also my close friend. The error was that I haven't started apt-cacher-ng yet. so after solving that I got a new error. With this error it took about three days to find a solution because it was a problem with the code or not with the code but the Ubuntu server location. Ubuntu has moved some archive files from Archive.ubuntu to old-releases.ubuntu. But the gitian builder was still fetching from that place. So as a normal bug solver. I edited the code on GitHub and sent a pull request for DevRandom to review. Guess what MY PULL WAS CORRECT SO HE MERGED ITT!!!! I was soo excited that day that I showed it to all my friends whether they understood or not. I was happy that I had contributed to the software which is literally the backbone of all Altcoins who build through Gitian. I was also happy that I had contributed to the same repository as the names like Gavin Andresen, Luke Dashjr , Hebasto and other prominent developers in the Bitcoin Development community. The link of my two pull request can be found here
  • MWEB Update from Developer David Burkett
    2 projects | /r/litecoin | 3 Nov 2021
    The release process we inherited from bitcoin can be quite painful. It uses gitian to build repeatable and deterministic binaries from the source code. This means that multiple people can all build the code on different machines (and even different operating systems) and still get the same exact release binaries. We can then all compare the results and then sign the release, certifying that we all agree that the published release is safe & accurate.
  • Thousands of Debian packages updated from their upstream Git repository
    4 projects | news.ycombinator.com | 25 Aug 2021
    For those interested in reproducible builds, the gitian [1] project is a fairly simple VM which sets the up the necessary environment for doing this sort of thing.

    The tooling and community around reproducible builds is growing all the time, and imo we should be insisting on it for things such as government apps.

    [1] https://github.com/devrandom/gitian-builder

  • How to verify Dogecoin Core binary releases
    3 projects | /r/dogecoindev | 29 Apr 2021
    git clone https://github.com/devrandom/gitian-builder git clone https://github.com/dogecoin/dogecoin git clone https://github.com/dogecoin/gitian.sigs pushd dogecoin git checkout v1.14.3 popd

What are some alternatives?

When comparing gitian.sigs and gitian-builder you can also consider the following projects:

dogecoin - very currency

litecoin

pacman-bintrans - Experimental binary transparency for pacman with sigstore and rekor

antimony - Antimony is a free open source peer-to-peer electronic cash system that is completely decentralized, without the need for a central server or trusted parties. Users hold the crypto keys to their own money and transact directly with each other, with the help of a P2P network to check for double-spending. Made as a product demo of a blockchain

peacenotwar - Attempts to determine if the computer its running on has an IP originating from Russia or Belarus. If it is then depending on the version of the malware either attempts to delete all files on the computer, or creates a text file on the computers desktop protesting the war in ukraine.

3270font - A 3270 font in a modern format

3270font - A 3270 font in a modern format

node-ipc - A nodejs module for local and remote Inter Process Communication (IPC), Neural Networking, and able to facilitate machine learning.

dogecoin - very currency

node-ipc - Drop-in fork of `node-ipc`.