docker-wine VS AppImageLauncher

Docker container This alternative would eat more resources than necessary as an additional OS would be running in the background. I've also noticed that displaying the application in X11/Wayland this way seems to introduce an overhead if no GPU is shared with the container (which is negligible with the proper configuration): https://github.com/scottyhardy/docker-wine

i do not know much about docker images so i may not be of much help here but i think you should check out this project to see if it may give you a baseline idea https://github.com/scottyhardy/docker-wine

For those not using windows (like Linux or Mac), you can use docker + wine, and works great! =) (If you need help, let me know so I can explain with more details.)

Every file that you want to execute has to be in your environment PATH. I would also advise to put symlinks and personal executables in ~/.local/bin and put that to your path. Since your user has ownership over that directory, you won't have any probs with permissions that may or may not occur at all. Since we're talking about AppImage files, you might also want to take a look at AppImageLauncher which does a pretty good job at creating entries for your Desktop Menu for the AppImage files that you install to your system.

I think it's safe to install it directly as it stores everything in a single directory. For AppImages there is also AppImagePool + AppImageLauncher (can be installed rootless, useful for better integration of appimages).

This reminds me of a prettier version of AppImageLauncher. Is there also an "Uninstall" option in the right-click menu of the app launcher?

I'm using AppImageLauncher on Fedora.

"... I recall that this was related to an issue with most Electron apps, wherein the AppImage cannot be integrated with the desktop or the favourites bar. So far we've found that the AppImageLauncher (https://github.com/TheAssassin/AppImageLauncher) helps with getting around this!