docker-commandbox
Official CommandBox Docker Image for ColdFusion/CFML/Java applications (by Ortus-Solutions)
setup-buildx-action
GitHub Action to set up Docker Buildx (by docker)
Our great sponsors
| docker-commandbox | setup-buildx-action | |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 14 | |
| 60 | 861 | |
| - | 4.6% | |
| 8.0 | 8.0 | |
| 16 days ago | 10 days ago | |
| Dockerfile | TypeScript | |
| - | Apache License 2.0 |
The number of mentions indicates the total number of mentions that we've tracked plus the number of user suggested alternatives.
Stars - the number of stars that a project has on GitHub. Growth - month over month growth in stars.
Activity is a relative number indicating how actively a project is being developed. Recent commits have higher weight than older ones.
For example, an activity of 9.0 indicates that a project is amongst the top 10% of the most actively developed projects that we are tracking.
Stars - the number of stars that a project has on GitHub. Growth - month over month growth in stars.
Activity is a relative number indicating how actively a project is being developed. Recent commits have higher weight than older ones.
For example, an activity of 9.0 indicates that a project is amongst the top 10% of the most actively developed projects that we are tracking.
docker-commandbox
Posts with mentions or reviews of docker-commandbox.
We have used some of these posts to build our list of alternatives
and similar projects. The last one was on 2021-12-02.
setup-buildx-action
Posts with mentions or reviews of setup-buildx-action.
We have used some of these posts to build our list of alternatives
and similar projects. The last one was on 2023-11-12.
-
GitHub Actions Are a Problem
Good luck running this locally. There's no script code to speak of, just references to external "actions" and parameters (for example, https://github.com/docker/setup-buildx-action).
Some CI platforms are just a simple glue layer (Gitlab CI - which I prefer - is one of them), but in most cases Github CI is not. Maybe it adds to the author frustration?
-
Automate Docker Image Builds and Push to Docker Hub Using GitHub Actions š³š
Set up Docker Buildx: We will use the docker/setup-buildx-action action to set up Docker Buildx.
-
One Dockerfile is all it takes, falling in love with bake
Thereās an amazing docker/bake-action which makes it insanely easy to build all of your containers in the most optimal way. Since weāve set the group ādefaultā block in the docker-bake.hcl, config is very minimal. One step in your GitHub Action workflow file will build all of your images and will push all of your cache layers, tag all of your containers, and push all your final images. Youāll still have to do things like checkout the code and donāt forget that youāll want to use the docker/setup-buildx-action since bake is a buildx feature. Thereās one quick gotcha for the actual docker/bake-action. We donāt want to push PR builds and we donāt want to pollute the cache with PR builds.
-
Building with Qemu via Github Actions taking forever. What other options are there?
To be clear, that article does NOT provide a solution for avoiding QEMU. I suggested it because it describes "the hard way" to get a single image multi-arch image. The github action crazy-max/ghaction-docker-buildx has been archived and replaced by docker/setup-qemu-action and docker/setup-buildx-action, which it seems like you were already using.
-
Pushing Cutom Images to Docker Hub using GitHub Actions
Third step is docker/setup-buildx-action configures buildx, which is a Docker CLI plugin that provides enhanced build capabilities.
-
Containerizing Laravel Applications
We then use the docker/setup-buildx-action action to initialize an environment to build Docker images:
-
How to use Docker layer caching in GitHub Actions
The setup-buildx-action configures Docker Buildx to create a builder instance for running the image build. The following step build-push-action, makes use of that instance to build your Docker image. The build-push-action supports all of the features provided by BuildKit out of the box. In our simple example, we are only specifying the Docker context, but more advanced features like SSH, secrets, and build args are supported.
- Why Darwin Failed (2006)
-
Multi-arch docker images the easy way, with Github Actions
# Get the repository's code - name: Checkout uses: actions/checkout@v2 # https://github.com/docker/setup-qemu-action - name: Set up QEMU uses: docker/setup-qemu-action@v1 # https://github.com/docker/setup-buildx-action - name: Set up Docker Buildx id: buildx uses: docker/setup-buildx-action@v1
-
Semantic release to npm and/or ghcr without any tooling
docker/setup-buildx-action@v1 - we use it to setup the docker builder
What are some alternatives?
When comparing docker-commandbox and setup-buildx-action you can also consider the following projects:
docker-action-examples
setup-qemu-action - GitHub Action to install QEMU static binaries
build-push-action - GitHub Action to build and push Docker images with Buildx
movie-list-app
buildkit - concurrent, cache-efficient, and Dockerfile-agnostic builder toolkit
metadata-action - GitHub Action to extract metadata (tags, labels) from Git reference and GitHub events for Docker
semver - Semantic Versioning Specification
setup-node - Set up your GitHub Actions workflow with a specific version of node.js
fixinator - ColdFusion / CFML Code Security Scanner
cache - Cache dependencies and build outputs in GitHub Actions
docker-commandbox vs docker-action-examples
setup-buildx-action vs setup-qemu-action
docker-commandbox vs setup-qemu-action
setup-buildx-action vs build-push-action
docker-commandbox vs movie-list-app
setup-buildx-action vs buildkit
docker-commandbox vs build-push-action
setup-buildx-action vs metadata-action
docker-commandbox vs semver
setup-buildx-action vs setup-node
docker-commandbox vs fixinator
setup-buildx-action vs cache