dnsproxy
ctrld
dnsproxy | ctrld | |
---|---|---|
56 | 22 | |
2,189 | 288 | |
1.7% | 4.2% | |
8.4 | 9.3 | |
6 days ago | 14 days ago | |
Go | Go | |
Apache License 2.0 | MIT License |
Stars - the number of stars that a project has on GitHub. Growth - month over month growth in stars.
Activity is a relative number indicating how actively a project is being developed. Recent commits have higher weight than older ones.
For example, an activity of 9.0 indicates that a project is amongst the top 10% of the most actively developed projects that we are tracking.
dnsproxy
- AdGuard Simple DNS Proxy with DoH, DoT, DoQ and DNSCrypt Support
-
Adguard adblocker vs Adguard DNS?
There's no difference between the free and freemium in regards to customizability while using VPN since both offer DoT endpoints. On Android, with the standard WireGuard & OpenVPN app you can use any DoT provider you want since the Android Private DNS setting takes precedence over the DNS settings in the VPN app. In Windows you can run https://github.com/AdguardTeam/dnsproxy locally, that way the VPN won't intercept and modify the local DNS traffic (the DNS upstream still goes through the VPN, but if you use DoT/DoH/DoQ then it continues to the DNS server you prefer).
-
VPN recommendation with DoH or DoQ
Which OS is this? In Android the Private DNS (DoT) setting is respected by some clients like the standard WireGuard & OpenVPN, so you can just load any provider's config and enter your personal DoT address. In iOS Passepartout can accept WG/OpenVPN config and apply custom DoH, as for desktop OS you can just run https://github.com/AdguardTeam/dnsproxy forwarding to your DoH/DoQ address and set the VPN interface to use localhost as DNS.
-
Privacy threat: needing to choose between VPN and DNS
If it's on a desktop/laptop, you can run https://github.com/AdguardTeam/dnsproxy to forward into your NextDNS DoH/DoT/DoQ, and set your VPN network adapter to use 127.0.0.1, 127.0.0.2, ::1 and ::2 for DNS (the secondary entry either loopback or fail entirely, all it matters is your OS shouldn't try other address), that way since local traffic isn't routed by the VPN, you still get NextDNS (the actual DoH/DoT/DoQ traffic is still going through the VPN).
-
Adguard on windows blocking dns rewrite of adguard home
Why not set AdGuard Home (assuming it's indeed installed at your home) to use DoT/DoH/DoQ upstream (so your ISP can't redirect it) and have the rewrites in AGH too? If your AGH instance isn't at home, assuming you're using Windows 11 set your AGH to listen on DoH and set Windows to use DoH to your AGH. Otherwise use dnsproxy in Windows to forward it to your AGH through DoT/DoH/DoQ.
- ISP di Indonesia sudah bisa deteksi penggunaan DNS over HTTPS/TLS?
-
Adguard Home and DNS-over-HTTPS
I'm not sure what is your plan here, do you need the Surfshark feature specifically, or do you just want to hide your traffic from your ISP? If you need Surfshark (perhaps for streaming geoblocked content or torrenting), then integrating it with AGH hosted on the cloud for device-wide traffic is going to be complicated. The Surfshark client doesn't support custom DoH/DoT address nor IPv6 (opening public IPv4 Do53 is a big no-no, you'll get swamped for DNS amplification attack), so you'll need an app running on your device to redirect DNS traffic like https://github.com/AdguardTeam/dnsproxy to your cloud AGH. You'd need to setup DoH with a custom path through Nginx otherwise people would scan your server and use it, plus if Google's crawler sees the AGH login page it will mark it as deceptive, and your entire domain is blacklisted by the Safe Browsing API that's used on multiple products (Chrome, Firefox, AdGuard, NextDNS, etc). With all that hassle might as well just run AGH locally on your device anyway (local traffic isn't handled by VPNs)
-
Client Settings Cached?
Assuming you have a custom upstream, it's by design
-
Feature Requests: Force use QUIC or DoQ Protocol, AnyCast/Ultralow toggle settings
Since nextdns-cli isn't likely to support DoQ anytime soon, your best bet is dnsproxy and ctrld.
- Feature Request: Different DoH per network i.e. different NextDNS per network.
ctrld
-
Using Control-D on your Mikrotik router
So when I discovered the Control D resolver, I thought I'd try to make this work instead. Getting it up and running in a Docker environment was easy. Repeating this on a Mikrotik router involved a little bit more learning on my part. The r/mikrotik community was instrumental in getting this up and running. As a thank-you for all the comments that helped me work this all out, I thought I'd write a full guide on how to replace the resolver built in to Router OS, with one by Control D.
-
Running Control D resolver on a Mikrotik router
With the help of others in r/mikrotik, I wrote a guide on how to run the ctrld resolver on a Mikrotik router. See here if you're interested.
-
Device creation when router doesn't support ctrld
If you can run Adguard for this, you can run ctrld directly on the same machine instead. It will do exactly what you wish, automatically. https://github.com/Control-D-Inc/ctrld
-
Device reporting
Please make an issue, and provide some details of your env here: https://github.com/Control-D-Inc/ctrld/issues
-
Automatically add devices to profiles?
https://github.com/Control-D-Inc/ctrld Install this on your router and build a custom config to do what you’re looking for
- Multi-protocol DNS proxy server (highly configurable)
-
What are some other useful, worthwhile things to install along with pi-hole?
If you want to use bleeding edge DNS protocols like DOQ, you can run this DNS proxy server: https://github.com/Control-D-Inc/ctrld
-
"ctrld" command line utility
The listener IP for ctrld config will route your devices connections. So you need to point your devices to the IP where ctrld is running. https://github.com/Control-D-Inc/ctrld
-
Policy route connections made by firewall itself
I'm running a DNS utility directly on the pfsense firewall (Control D https://github.com/Control-D-Inc/ctrld/releases) and wanting to policy route the connections it makes through VPN gateways instead of WAN.
-
Is there a server similar to adguandhome that supports client ID identification
Check out ctrld: https://github.com/Control-D-Inc/ctrld
What are some alternatives?
Unbound - Unbound is a validating, recursive, and caching DNS resolver.
fritzconnection - Python-Tool to communicate with the AVM Fritz!Box by the TR-064 protocol and the AHA-HTTP-Interface
mosdns - 一个 DNS 转发器
Pi.Alert - WIFI / LAN intruder detector. Check the devices connected and alert you with unknown devices. It also warns of the disconnection of "always connected" devices
doh-cf-workers - DNS-over-HTTPS proxy on Cloudflare Workers
Pi.Alert - Scan the devices connected to your WIFI / LAN and alert you the connection of unknown devices. It also warns if a "always connected" device disconnects. In addition, it is possible to check web services for availability. For this purpose HTTP status codes and the response time of the service are evaluated.
jp.tiar.app - jp.tiar.app
serverless-dns - The RethinkDNS resolver that deploys to Cloudflare Workers, Deno Deploy, Fastly, and Fly.io
nextdns - NextDNS CLI client (DoH Proxy)
mikrotik-scripts - MikroTik RouterOS scripts
sdns - A high-performance, recursive DNS resolver server with DNSSEC support, focused on preserving privacy.
midway - A rudimentary middleware for port 80 and port 443 over tcp